Zia's
Question and Solution for Week 2
'The
advantage of bidding is to describe your hand to your partner. Pre-emptive
bidding can often be a double-edged sword. Although it limits communication
between your opponents, as information it can turn out to be what
Neil Armstrong might describe as one small step for partner, one
giant leap for opponents.' - ZIA
East
deals and NS are vulnerable. Zia picks up this really good hand:
The
bidding is as follows:
West
|
North
|
East
|
South
|
|
|
3
|
6
|
Pass
|
Pass
|
Pass
|
|
East
opens with an awkward bid of 3.
Zia doesn't really have any way of bidding his giant of a hand scientifically.
He could settle for 4
and a sure profit, but that's not his style. So Zia bids a bold
6. The chances are that
Zia's partner will have some bits and pieces to enable him to make
a slam - after all, the K
by itself would be enough. The final contract is 6.
West
leads 2 and when Zia
sees dummy, he regrets his decision:
Zia's
partner does indeed have some bits and pieces - the trouble is that
they don't appear to be where Zia needs them. After West's opening
lead of 2, Zia plays
low with 4 from dummy,
East contributes a studious 7,
and Zia wins with A.
What
card would Zia play next?
Zia's
Solution
The
full deal is as shown:
Zia's answer is 8, 6,
5 or 3
(each of these cards is considered correct for the Orbis Hand of
the Week).
Zia
needs to reach the heart winners in dummy. There are three possible
approaches:
1.
Play a Low Spade (Zia's Solution)
Lead
a low spade towards 9,
hoping that West will have 10.
This is the best percentage play, especially given that East opened
with a 3 pre-empt.
On the actual deal, West would win with 10
(ducking would not help). Whatever suit West returns, Zia can win.
For example, if West returns a spade dummy's 9
will win the trick. Zia's carefully crafted entry to dummy now enables
him to cash the AKQ,
discarding his club and diamond losers.
Final
Result: NS win 12 tricks for +1430
2.
Play a High Spade (Approach 'A')
You
could cash A,
hoping to drop the singleton 10.
In this case, 9
would be an entry to dummy's AKQ.
On the actual deal, this approach would not succeed. Cashing a high
spade could have worked, but playing a low spade is the better percentage
play given East's 3
bid.
3.
Play a High Spade (Approach 'B')
A possible
approach would be to draw trumps hoping 10
falls, failing which to then exit with Q
in the hope that West has to give dummy an entry. On the actual
deal, West's 10
does not drop but there is still a chance. Zia can draw the remaining
trump and then exit with Q.
If West wins with K and
started with KJ, he will
have to present you with an entry to dummy. This might work, but
it is more likely that West will have one specific card, 10,
than two specific cards, K
and J (making Zia's strategy
of playing a low spade wiser). Besides, even if West does have that
club holding, he can always duck Q!
Then, Zia will succeed only if West began with two or three clubs
and East five or four - wildly unlikely on the bidding. Again, Zia's
approach of playing a low spade is the better percentage play.
Just
a hint - after you rack up the slam with this play, it would not
be appropriate to sing 'Fly me to the moon!'
Back
Conceived
and sponsored by Orbis Investment Management Limited. To learn about
the award winning Orbis Funds, visit www.orbis.bm.
|