Italy vs Denmark
Final Segment 5 (Boards 65-80)
32 boards to go and Italy was in the lead with a 50 IMP margin.
Board 3. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 7 6 2
© 9 8 4 3
¨ 6 3 2
§ K 6 3 |
ª Q J 10 9 8
© -
¨ K Q 10 9 4
§ J 10 7 |
|
ª A 4 3
© Q 5 2
¨ A 8 5
§ A Q 4 2 |
|
ª K 5
© A K J 10 7 6
¨ J 7
§ 9 8 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Schaltz |
Lo Presti |
Gjaldbaek |
Mazzadi |
|
|
|
1© |
2© |
3© |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
S. di Bello |
J. Houmoller |
F. di Bello |
B. Houmoller |
|
|
|
1© |
3§ |
3© |
4© |
5© |
Pass |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
The auction was fun in the Open Room and we were all disappointed
when Mazzadi didn’t continue with 5©.
2© showed spades
and a minor. Actually, the key to a good board for the Italians
was that Mazzadi didn’t bid 5©
over 4©. If he had
done so East/West could have revalued their cards enough to bid
the slam. Furio di Bello listened to his brother’s 3§
which promised spades and diamonds, though he did well to go on
to slam, a slam which requires diamonds to split plus one out of
two finesses to succeed. The combined chances to make the contract
are decent, not a perfect slam indeed but the only criteria to decide
if a slam is good or bad is whether it makes or not – and
that made this a good one. This first swing gave Italy 13 IMPs and
they were now ahead by 63 IMPs.
What’s your lead sitting East?
ª
9 7 ©
10 3 ¨ Q J
9 4 2 § Q
10 9 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
1NT |
2ª |
Dble |
3ª |
4§ |
4ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
1NT is a strong no trump overcall (about 15-16 HCP) but can sometimes
be semi-balanced.
Gjaldbaek led a trump.
Board 6. E/W Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª K Q J 6 5 4
© Q 8
¨ 8 6 3
§ 8 6 |
ª 10
© K J 6 5
¨ A K 10
§ K J 7 5 3 |
|
ª 9 7
© 10 3
¨ Q J 9 4 2
§ Q 10 9 2 |
|
ª A 8 3 2
© A 9 7 4 2
¨ 7 5
§ A 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Schaltz |
Lo Presti |
Gjaldbaek |
Mazzadi |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
1NT |
2ª |
Dble |
3ª |
4§ |
4ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
S. di Bello |
J. Houmoller |
F. di Bello |
B. Houmoller |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
2§ |
2ª |
3§ |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
It is not obvious what to lead but it’s sensible to try to
establish some tricks here so a minor-suit lead should have been
preferred. After the spade lead Lo Presti didn’t have any
problems to make his contract; N/S +590 and that was worth 10 IMPs
to Italy when the Houmollers scored +140.
Board 10. All Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª 4 2
© K Q 9 7 5
¨ A Q 5
§ Q 8 7 |
ª A K 8 7 6 5 3
© 10
¨ 10 9 4
§ 9 2 |
|
ª J 10 9
© 8
¨ K 8 7 6 3
§ A J 4 3 |
|
ª Q
© A J 6 4 3 2
¨ J 2
§ K 10 6 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Schaltz |
Lo Presti |
Gjaldbaek |
Mazzadi |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
4ª |
5© |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
S. di Bello |
J. Houmoller |
F. di Bello |
B. Houmoller |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
3ª |
4© |
4ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
You have four losers in 4ª but with a little help from the Houmollers
declarer made the contract. North led ©K then switched to §Q. Declarer
cashed two rounds of trumps then played a club to South’s
ten. Now came a helpful heart from Bjorg for a ruff and discard;
E/W –790. At the other table Lo Presti/Mazzadi sacrificed
nicely in 5©; undoubled and –100 which gave Italy 12 more
IMPs.
Board 15. N/S Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 4 3
© A 10 9 8 4 3
¨ 6 4
§ J 10 8 |
ª K Q 10 8 7 6 2
© 5
¨ -
§ K Q 7 6 5 |
|
ª A
© K Q 7
¨ A K Q J 10 9 3 2
§ A |
|
ª J 9 5
© J 6 2
¨ 8 7 5
§ 9 4 3 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Schaltz |
Lo Presti |
Gjaldbaek |
Mazzadi |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
S. di Bello |
J. Houmoller |
F. di Bello |
B. Houmoller |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6ª |
Pass |
7NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
Did you ever had a better hand than East’s? I don’t
think I have ever had one as good as this. East was surely a bit
surprised when his partner opened the bidding. In the Closed Room
the di Bello brothers had a bidding misunderstanding – obviously
– and Jonas Houmoller dared to double even though he was not
on lead. As you can see East’s hand is not only just amazing,
East/West’s hands don’t fit together as the declarer
will be blocked in hand in a trump contract. As a matter of a fact
West’s hand is useless playing in no trump and Furio di Bello
had to face that fact at the table; two down, N/S +300.
In the Open Room Schaltz/Gjaldbaek put themselves in 6¨
after a Blackwood sequence (if the di Bellos pay enough they can
give the Italians a lesson in Blackwood after the match). 6ª
is the right slam to be in, where there is a winning line of discarding
two clubs on high diamonds. Lo Presti led the only card that helped
declarer to make his contract: ©A!
This last slam swing gave Denmark 15 needed IMPs but when this
board was the only swing of the set for the Danes they were way
behind Italy in the battle for the gold medals. With only 16 boards
to play Italy had enlarged the margin to 93 IMPs.
|