Round Four – Thailand
vs Denmark
Denmark are one of a number of European teams fancied to give
a good account of themselves in this tournament. In Round 4 they
met Thailand, who surprised many people when they reached the semi-final
in Brazil 2001. Today was not a great one for the Thais.
Denmark led 2-0 after two boards, then Boje Henriksen made a truly
wonderful decision for his side on Board 3.
Board 3. E/W Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 10 7 2
© 6 4
¨ A 8 6
§ K Q 8 4 3 |
ª A Q J 8 6
© A
¨ K J 7 5 4
§ J 2 |
|
ª 9 5 4 3
© J 10 9 5
¨ Q 10 9 3 2
§ - |
|
ª K
© K Q 8 7 3 2
¨ -
§ A 10 9 7 6 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
|
|
1© |
1ª |
2§ |
2ª |
4¨ |
Dble |
Rdbl |
Pass |
4ª |
Dble |
4NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
|
|
1© |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
3§ |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6§ |
Pass |
Pass |
6¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
In the Closed Room, the Houmollers bid up to 6§
under their own steam and Amornpong Vichayapaibunnag’s spade
lead permitted Terasak Chitngamkusol to take his two aces for down
one; –50. I will use this Thai pair’s first names from
now on as the family names are both long and difficult for non-Thais.
In the other room, Andreas Marquardsen contented himself with
only one positive call on the West cards, showing spades and a minor
then staying silent for the remainder of the auction. Sasibut/Trimankha
got to 5§ then Trimankha
thought long and hard before going on to slam. He no doubt imagined
that his partner’s sequence would deliver the ªA
instead of the ¨A
– and I suspect that he was correct, in theory. Now it was
Henriksen’s turn to think and at the end of a long hard study
he came up with a bid of 6¨,
vulnerable against not. He could not have imagined that this was
about to make and mush have been charmed, first by the sight of
dummy, then by the immediate appearance of the king of spades ion
the first round of that suit; +1540 and 16 IMPs to Denmark.
Board 5. N/S Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª A Q 9 6 3
© 10 4
¨ J 8 7 5 4
§ 9 |
ª 5 4
© Q J 9 7 6 3
¨ Q 2
§ A 10 6 |
|
ª K J 8 7
© K 8 5
¨ A K 6
§ J 4 2 |
|
ª 10 2
© A 2
¨ 10 9 3
§ K Q 8 7 5 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
Pass |
1¨ |
2§ |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
All Pass |
Both declarers received the lead of the king of clubs but there
was an important difference in that Marquardsen had been warned
of the bad club split by Trimankha’s 2§
overcall while Amornpong had no such clue.
arquardsen won the ace of clubs and played three rounds of diamonds
for aclub pitch from hand then played a heart. He could ruff the
third club high draw trumps and as it turned out there was no spade
guess; +170.
Perhaps Amornpong should have played the same way after the appearance
of the §9 at trick
one, but this would have left him reliant on a winning spade view
and the clubs did not have to be breaking badly. He played trumps
without throwing a club and ran into a club ruff for down one; –50
and 6 IMPs to Denmark when it might have been 6 IMPs the other way.
Board 6. E/W Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª A 7 6 2
© K 6 4
¨ 7
§ A K 10 6 3 |
ª J 8 3
© A J
¨ K J 10 8 5 3 2
§ 7 |
|
ª K 9 4
© 9 8
¨ 9 6 4
§ J 9 8 5 2 |
|
ª Q 10 5
© Q 10 7 5 3 2
¨ A Q
§ Q 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
3¨ |
Dble |
4¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
This was another great chance for Thailand to gain a major swing
and once again the chance was missed. The Houmollers were permitted
a free run when Terasak failed to come in on the West cards –
an odd decision to my eyes. They looked at the possibility of slam
but then settled in game and made only ten tricks after a diamond
lead for +420.
Marquardsen did come in as West, with a weak jump overcall of
3¨. Sasibut had to
begin with a negative double and Henriksen ventured a very sporting,
at the prevailing vulnerability, 4¨
raise. Now Sasibut was rather heavy for a quiet 4©
but had no clear and descriptive slam try available. He solved his
problem by taking control, trusting that there would be little diamond
wastage on the hand, and asked for key cards. When he found that
his partner held one key card he bid the small slam.
A spade lead defeats 6©
but, not unreasonably, Marquardsen chose a diamond. The ¨J
ran to Trimankha’s queen and he played a heart. Marquardsen
rose with the ©A
and exited with the jack to dummy’s king. If clubs are no
worse than four-two, it is a simple matter of ruffing out the suit
to establish a second spade discard and Trimankha seems to have
looked no further than that. When he continued with two rounds of
clubs he had to go down one; –50 and 10 IMPs to Denmark, extending
their lead to 34-0.
The successful line is the black-suit squeeze against East. This
will succeed whenever the hand with the king of spades holds four
or more clubs. In other words, on the assumption that West does
not hold the sxK for his weak jump overcall, and he has already
shown up with ©AJ,
it works whenever the line chosen at the table works and also on
a five-one split, with the exception of the case where West holds
a 0-2-7-4 shape including the §J.
If at trick four declarer cashes the ªA,
Vienna Coup, he will succeed on the actual lie as East cannot survive
the run of the red winners, but he will also discover the need to
revert to the club establishment line when West shows out, and still
has a heart in dummy to get to the fifth club. So declarer’s
line was a clear error and cost his side 21 IMPs.
Board 7. All Vul. Dealer South.
|
|
ª 9 8 6 5 3
© A 9 7 3
¨ A K 5
§ J |
ª K J 10 7 2
© 5
¨ 10 4
§ Q 10 8 7 4 |
|
ª A
© J 8 4
¨ 9 8 6 2
§ A K 6 5 3 |
|
ª Q 4
© K Q 10 6 2
¨ Q J 7 3
§ 9 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
|
|
1© |
1ª |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Dble |
4© |
Dble |
Pass |
4ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
|
|
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
2§ |
Pass |
4§ |
4© |
All Pass |
|
I am not sure what was going on in the Closed Room. Terasak overcalled
1ª, which is fine
with me, but I am not sure that he should have doubled 3§,
even if that looked to be a free shot at showing his second suit,
when holding only 6 HCP. The message seems not to have got across
to Amornpong, who left 4ª
doubled in when he could have converted to 5§,
which is only down one and therefore a good save despite the vulnerability.
Even with the fall of the ªQ,
4ª doubled cost
–800.
Marquardsen did not come in on the first round but made a pre-emptive
jump raise when Henriksen could overcall in clubs. The vulnerability
stopped him from going on to 5§,
however, particularly as spades had been bid on his left. Four Hearts
made exactly for +620 to Thailand but 5 IMPs to Denmark.
This was beginning to look ugly for the Thais and as Denmark picked
up 6 Imp swings on each of the next two deals the score was up to
51-0 after nine deals. At last, there was a small ray of light for
Thailand:
Board 10. All Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª Q J 7 5
© 8 7 4
¨ K Q J 5 4
§ K |
ª -
© Q 6 2
¨ 8 6
§ A Q J 10 7 6 3 2 |
|
ª K 10 8 6 4
© A J 9 5
¨ 2
§ 9 5 4 |
|
ª A 9 3 2
© K 10 3
¨ A 10 9 7 3
§ 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
5§ |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
|
2© |
Dble |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
|
Terasak’s 4§
opening caught a raise from Amornpong who, of course, just had to
guess at whether his values would be well-placed. Terasak got the
trumps right for a useful +600.
Henriksen had a toy for the East hand, 2©
showing a weak hand with both majors. Trimankha’s double was
a curious effort as it is normal to play this as either a good hand
or perhaps for take-out and he has neither. Probably, the Thais
are simply not be used to this particular weak opening and have
not practiced against it. Whether or not it would have been possible
for East/West to get to game after the 2©
opening even if left to their own devices I rather doubt, but South’s
double would have discouraged either of his opponents from making
an optimistic choice and they duly stopped in 3§.
Note North’s silence, suggesting that perhaps the double did
not promise the earth. Three Clubs made eleven tricks when Sasibut
led the ¨K and Trimankha
overtook to switch to a club and Marquardsen guessed right; +150
but 10 IMPs to Thailand.
Thailand picked up an overtrick IMP on Board 11 then another big
swing on Board 12.
Board 12. N/S Vul. Dealer West.
|
|
ª A 10 8
© A 10
¨ K 6
§ A 10 9 6 4 2 |
ª J 9 3
© Q 9 5 3
¨ Q J 8 2
§ K 3 |
|
ª K Q 7 5 2
© K 8 7 6
¨ 10 9
§ 7 5 |
|
ª 6 4
© J 4 2
¨ A 7 5 4 3
§ Q J 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
Pass |
1§ |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Houmoller’s 1§
opening saw his opponents bid and raise spades and now he could
do no more than compete in his six-card suit, making no less than
twelve tricks on a spade lead for +170. South, for whom a negative
double would have shown either four hearts or a strong hand, never
had a sensible way to show her values.
Sasibut’s strong no trump opening made everything very straightforward.
Trimankha’s raise to 3Nt was a shade on the aggressive side
but the final contract was an excellent one and it was certainly
time for the Thais to get stuck in to this match. The opening lead
was a low spade and sasibut held up until the third round. Technically,
he should have played ace and another club now, gaining against
bare king with East and spades five-three. In practice, Sasibut
crossed to the ace of diamonds to take the club finesse and had
an overtrick for +630 and 10 IMPs to Thailand.
The margin was looking a little more respectable now at 21-51
but any hopes Thailand had of coming back into the match were dashed
by two quick game swings to Denmark.
Board 13. All Vul. Dealer North.
|
|
ª 8 5
© 8 5 2
¨ 9 8 4 2
§ K Q 4 3 |
ª A K 7 6 4
© A Q 7 3
¨ K J 3
§ 9 |
|
ª Q J
© J 9 4
¨ A 10
§ J 10 7 6 5 2 |
|
ª 10 9 3 2
© K 10 6
¨ Q 7 6 5
§ A 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Terasak simply did not bid enough in the Closed Room. Although
it is true that East’s sequence could have delivered only
a doubleton spade and 6 HCP, it could, as here, have been a good
deal stronger. It looks normal to go on with 3¨
over 2ª, and that
would have seen one or other of the good games reached. On the lead
of the king of clubs, Terasak made ten tricks for +170.
In the other room the danes were favoured by their lighter two-over-one
style. It was routine for Marquardsen to drive to game as soon as
his partner responded 2§.
The lead against 3NT was adiamond to the ten, queen and king. Marquardsen
crossed to the queen of spades and cashed the jack also before playing
the ©J to king and
ace. Now he cashed out the spades and North threw a heart. A diamond
to the ace was followed by the ©9,
covered and dropping the eight. Now Marquardsen had twelve tricks
for +690 and 11 IMPs. Note that picking up the heart suit was worth
an extra IMP despite the Thai East/West pair not having reached
game.
Board 14. None Vul. Dealer East.
|
|
ª 9
© A 6 4
¨ J 7 6
§ A Q 7 6 5 3 |
ª J 10 7 6 4
© 9 5 2
¨ A 8 3
§ J 2 |
|
ª Q 3 2
© K Q J 7 3
¨ K 2
§ 10 8 4 |
|
ª A K 8 5
© 10 8
¨ Q 10 9 5 4
§ K 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Chitngamk |
J.Houmoller |
Vichayapa |
B.Houmoller |
|
|
1© |
Dble |
2© |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Marquardsen |
Sasibut |
Henriksen |
Trimankha |
|
|
1© |
Dble |
1ª |
2ª |
All Pass |
|
Jonas Houmoller took a practical shot when he jumped to 3NT rather
than worry about a possible club game. After a heart lead he took
his nine tricks for +400.
Marquardsen’s 1ª
response created more of a problem for sasibut, for whom a jump
to 3NT when holding a small singleton spade would have been a big
position to take even when allowing for the fact that partner had
suggested some spade length. Sasibut’s choice of a 2ª
cuebid was not a success when Trimankha passed it. Clearly someone
forgot the system – my guess is North but I could be wrong.
The lead was the king of hearts to declarer’s ace and Sasibut
played three rounds of clubs, throwing dummy’s heart loser.
Marquardsen ruffed and switched to a low spade for the queen and
ace and declarer played a diamond to the jack and king. Henriksen
led a heart now for dummy to ruff and Sasibut played the ¨Q.
Marquardsen won and played the ªJ
to the king. As both defenders held a heart, declarer had to come
to one more heart ruff when he next played the ¨10
for East to ruff; down one for –100 and another 10 IMPs to
Denmark.
Thailand outscored their opponents by 5-2 IMPs over the last six
deals of the match but that was not quite sufficient to prevent
Denmark from achieving a maximum 25 VPs. The final score was 76-27
IMPs, 25-2 VPs. Denmark followed this up with a 25-4 win over Uruguay
to give them a perfect 50 VPs out of 50 on day two of the championships.
|