The Riddle of the Sphinx
Although no Egyptian pair qualified for the final of the Women's
pairs their most famous combination scored well on this deal:
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª 4
© Q 2
¨ K Q 8 6 5 2
§ J 8 6 4 |
ª A K 7 3 2
© 10 9 8
¨ A
§ A 10 7 3 |
|
ª 10 6 5
© A J 6 5
¨ 10 7 4
§ K 5 2 |
|
ª Q J 9 8
© K 7 4 3
¨ J 9 3
§ Q 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Maud |
|
Lily |
|
1ª |
2¨ |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
North led the king of diamonds and declarer won with he ace and
ran the nine of hearts to South's king. Not wishing to allow declarer
to shorten her trumps South found the good shot of switching to
the nine of clubs. Declarer won in hand, cashed her top trumps getting
the bad news and then played the ten of hearts, covered by the queen
and ace. A diamond ruff to hand allowed declarer to score the eight
of hearts and she then crossed to dummy with a club to cash the
last heart and ruffed a diamond. Making ten tricks was a very fine
score.
The only lead to defeat the contract by force is the queen of hearts,
which removes a vital entry from dummy.
An Early Claim
By Patrick Jourdain (Wales)
Cezary Balicki approached. "Do you want a good hand?"
he said. "Is the Pope Polish?" was my thought. The deal
arose in the first set of the Power Rosenblum quarterfinal. The
England team containing a Scot, a Swede and a New Zealander was
playing Poland, a team with two Italians. (In the old days we expected
Poles in teams of other nationalities; now it seems the wheel has
turned).
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª A J 9 7 6 4
© 8
¨ 8 7 4 3 2
§ 4 |
ª 10
© 10 9 6 5 2
¨ K 10 6
§ Q 9 7 6 |
|
ª Q 8 5 3
© K Q 7
¨ A J
§ A K 3 2 |
|
ª K 2
© A J 4 3
¨ Q 9 5
§ J 10 8 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Zmudzinski |
Hackett |
Balicki |
Hackett |
|
2ª |
Dble |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
The Poles play Lebensohl after a weak Two is doubled for take-out,
so West's Three Hearts was actually showing extra values.
South led the king of spades, then a second spade. Balicki as declarer
already had a problem: what to discard from dummy? He could not
afford a club if North had singleton honour, he certainly did not
want to ditch a diamond, and if the hearts were coming in he would
be throwing a winner if he released a card in that suit.
Eventually he chose to throw a heart on the basis that if the suit
was favourable he would be home anyway.
When North won trick two he switched to a heart which went to the
king and ace.
South could not play a minor suit without conceding an immediate
trick, and continued hearts. Declarer won in dummy with the ten
and North showed out, throwing a spade. Balicki now tested clubs
by cashing ace and king. When North showed out again, this time
discarding a diamond, Balicki, with some flamboyance, laid down
the queen of spades, and claimed. This was the ending:
|
|
ª J 9 7
© -
¨ 8 7 4 3
§ - |
ª -
© 9 6
¨ K 10 6
§ Q 9 |
|
ª Q 8
© Q
¨ A J
§ 3 2 |
|
ª -
© J 4
¨ Q 9 5
§ J 10 |
To South he said, "you have to keep your hearts and clubs,
so will have to come down to two diamonds now. I throw a heart from
dummy and play two more rounds of clubs. You will have to win and
return a red suit. After the ace of diamonds and top heart your
partner has to keep spades guarded, so will also have to come down
to two diamonds. I make a ninth trick whoever has the queen of diamonds."
The twins conceded. At the other table Two Spades
doubled had gone only one light, so the Poland team had gained 7
IMPs.
|