Back in the match
In the Power Rosenblum seminfinal round, the Swedish Fredin team
took it on the chin in the opening set against the Italian Lavazza
squad and were down 50-6 entering the second quarter. If they were
to get back into the match, they had no time to waste.
The young Swedes did manage to make a match of it, winning the
second set 42-13.
They scored a major swing on the first deal, where Lorenzo Lauria-Alfredo
Versace opposed Peter Fredin and Magnus Lindkvist in the open room.
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª A 10 3 2
© J
¨ A 7 2
§ A Q 10 5 2 |
ª Q
© K Q 10 9 8 4 2
¨ Q 8 3
§ 8 6 |
|
ª J 9 7 5 4
© 5 3
¨ 9 6 5 4
§ 7 4 |
|
ª K 8 6
© A 7 6
¨ K J 10
§ K J 9 3 |
In the closed room, Fredrik Nystrom and Peter Bertheau faced Norberto
Bocchi and Giorgio Duboin. The Swedes had a long, complicated auction
to arrive at the best spot, which was 6§.
In the closed room, Nystrom, South, won the opening heart lead,
eliminated hearts, pulled trumps and played a spade, ducking when
West played the queen. Duboin had to lead a diamond, finding the
¨Q for declarer,
or give a ruff-sluff. That was plus 920 on a well-played deal.
In the open room, the auction went wrong for team Lavazza.
Fredin |
Lauria |
Lindkvist |
Versace |
|
1§ |
Pass |
2§
(1) |
3© |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
5NT |
Pass |
7§ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
(1) Game forcing
No matter what Versace did, there was no play for 13 tricks and
he was quickly down one. Fredin had just cut 14 IMPs from the deficit.
A few boards later, the Italians had another accident involving
a club slam.
Board 22. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª 8 7 5
© K 10 9 8 2
¨ A K 6 2
§ 5 |
ª A Q
© 6 5 4
¨ Q 8 5
§ K 10 7 6 4 |
|
ª K J 9 6 2
© A Q J 7
¨ -
§ A Q 3 2 |
|
ª 10 4 3
© 3
¨ J 10 9 7 4 3
§ J 9 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Fredin |
Lauria |
Lindkvist |
Versace |
|
|
1§ (1) |
Pass |
1NT |
2© |
2ª |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
7§ |
All Pass |
|
|
(1) Strong and artificial.
Lindkvist might not have been so anxious to try for a grand slam
except that he was certain that if a heart finesse was needed it
was going to work.
There was no problem in the play and Lindkvist scored up plus 2140
for the well-bid slam. At the other table, Bocchi and Duboin seemed
to be heading in the right direction, but
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Bertheau |
Bocchi |
Nystrom |
|
|
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
The same number of tricks came in, but plus 190 meant Italy had
suffered an 18-IMP loss. The Fredin team was making a big comeback.
The Swedes gained another 4 IMPs on this deal, but it was touch
and go as each side let opportunities slip.
Board 25. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª Q J 3 2
© A K J 4
¨ J 8 4 3
§ 2 |
ª 9 7 6
© Q 5 2
¨ Q 9 7
§ A K 10 9 |
|
ª A 8 4
© 9 8 3
¨ A 5 2
§ J 8 7 4 |
|
ª K 10 5
© 10 7 6
¨ K 10 6
§ Q 6 5 3 |
In the closed room, South (Nystrom) played in 1NT, the defenders
getting four club tricks and two aces. It was a seesaw battle in
the open room, the Swedes finally prevailing.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Fredin |
Lauria |
Lindkvist |
Versace |
|
1¨ |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Fredin started with the ª6
to Lindkvist's ace. A club was returned to the 10, and Fredin cashed
the §A before getting
out with a spade to Versace's king. Versace then played a heart
to dummy's jack, and he was in a position to take four hearts and
three spades for his contract. Rather than rely on the hearts to
break favorably, however, Versace played a diamond to his 10 and
Fredin's queen.
Now Fredin was in a position to defeat the contract by simply returning
a diamond to his partner's ace for another club through the South
hand. Fredin, however, got out with a spade and, once again, Versace
was in a position to make the contract. Still apparently doubting
hearts, however, Versace played his ¨K.
Lindkvist won the ¨A
and completed ended the suspense by playing another club. That was
plus 50 and another small gain for Fredin.
The following deal was of interest for what might have been.
Board 27. Dealer South. None Vul.
|
|
ª 9 7 6
© K 10 7 5 4 3 2
¨ J
§ 5 3 |
ª J 10 2
© A 8
¨ A Q 6 4 3 2
§ 4 2 |
|
ª A K 5
© 9
¨ K 9 8 7 5
§ K Q 8 6 |
|
ª Q 8 4 3
© Q J 6
¨ 10
§ A J 10 9 7 |
Closed room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Bertheau |
Bocchi |
Nystrom |
|
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
2© |
Dble |
3© |
3NT |
4© |
Dble |
All Pass |
Bertheau's somewhat eccentric "re-preempt" paid off as
the defenders had only five tricks - two spades, a diamond, a heart
and a club - to score plus 300. At the other table:
West |
North |
East |
South |
Fredin |
Lauria |
Lindkvist |
Versace |
|
|
|
Pass |
1¨ |
3© |
4© |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
It appeared that Fredin and Lindkvist were headed for a diamond
slam. Would they make it? Can you see the only lead to defeat the
slam? It seems very possible that Lauria would have found the killing
lead against 6¨.
After all, he found the only lead to hold declarer to 11 tricks
- a spade.
The spade lead removes a vital entry to dummy that declarer needs
later to execute a trump squeeze on South. Look what happens on,
say, a heart lead.
Declarer wins the ace, pulls trumps with one round and plays a
club to dummy's king. South cannot return a spade without giving
declarer his 12 trick, so he probably would get out with the §J.
Declarer wins in dummy, plays a heart to the ace and ruffs a heart.
Then he runs trumps, reaching this position:
|
|
ª 9 7 6
© K10
¨ ---
§ --- |
ª J 10 2
© ---
¨ 3 2
§ --- |
|
ª A K 5
© ---
¨
§ 8 6 |
|
ª Q 8 4
© ---
¨ ---
§ 10 9 |
Declarer plays his next-to-last trump, discarding the ª5
from dummy and South can fold up his cards and ask partner why he
didn't start with a spade. If South discards a spade, declarer cashes
dummy's high ones and ruffs a club back to hand to enjoy the ªJ.
If declarer discards a club, West plays to dummy's ªA,
ruffs a club and returns to dummy with the other spade to enjoy
the now-good §8.
Plus 400 for Fredin-Lindkvist added up to another
3 IMPs for their side.
|