| Crouching tigers With 16 deals to go in the Venice Cup final, USA I led China by 
              a score of 193.3-169. It was a useful lead, but not insurmountable. 
              There were some nervous moments for the Americans, but they eventually 
              prevailed. Here are few deals from the last round. USA I started 
              off with an 11-IMP swing. 
             
              
                | Board 17. Dealer North. None 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª Q © Q J 6 5 2
 ¨ 5
 § A K J 9 4 3
 |  ª 9 4 © K 10 9 8
 ¨ K 9 8 3 2
 § 10 6
 |  | ª 10 8 3 2 © 7 4
 ¨ A Q J 10 7
 § 8 2
 | 
|  | ª A K J 7 6 5 © A 3
 ¨ 6 4
 § Q 7 5
 |  Janice Seamon-Molson and Tobi Sokolow had an excellent auction 
              to the top spot in the closed room. 
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Yu | Seamon-Molson | Hongli | Sokolow |   
                |  | 1§ | 1¨ | 1ª |   
                | 4¨ | 4© | Pass | 6§ |   
                | All Pass |  |  |  |  Sokolow knew her partner was not introducing a four-card suit at 
              the four level, so she accurately pictured a hand with 6-5 shape. 
              The chances were good, therefore, that Seamon-Molson had a singleton 
              or void in diamonds. Indeed, the ¨A was the only trick for the defense. 
              That was plus 920 to USA I.  Curiously, the Chinese in the open room had a more difficult time 
              without interference. 
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Levin | Liping | Picus | Wenfei |   
                |  | 2§ | Pass | 2¨ |   
                | Pass | 3© | Pass | 3ª |   
                | Pass | 4§ | Pass | 4NT |   
                | Pass | 5§ | All Pass |  |  Perhaps the meaning of 4NT was not entirely clear to Liping Wang. 
              In any case, Wenfei Wang considered her final call for some time 
              before putting the green pass card on the table.  China picked up 5 IMPs on the next deal when Sue Picus and Jill 
              Levin got too high in a heart partial, going minus 50 against plus 
              140 in the closed room.  China trailed 204.3-182 when the following deal came up. 
             
              
                | Board 22. Dealer East. E/W 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª A J 2 © 10 6
 ¨ A Q J 3 2
 § Q 10 3
 |  ª 10 7 6 4 © K J 2
 ¨ 10 6
 § K 9 6 5
 |  | ª - © 8 3
 ¨ K 8 7 5 4
 § A J 8 7 4 2
 | 
|  | ª K Q 9 8 5 3 © A Q 9 7 5 4
 ¨ 9
 § -
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Levin | Liping | Picus | Wenfei |   
                |  |  | Pass | 1ª |   
                | Pass | 2¨ | Pass | 2© |   
                | Pass | 4ª | Pass | 6ª |   
                | All Pass |  |  |  |  Levin led a low spade, which Wenfei rode around to her 5. She cashed 
              the ©A, went to dummy with the ¨A and played a low heart to the 
              8, queen and king. That was the only trick for the defense. Plus 
              980.  The auction got out of hand in the closed room. 
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Yu | Seamon-Molson | Hongli | Sokolow |   
                |  |  | Pass | 1ª |   
                | Pass | 2¨ | Pass | 2© |   
                | Pass | 2ª | Pass | 5§ |   
                | Pass | 5ª | Pass | 6© |   
                | Pass | 7ª | All Pass |  |  Sokolow’s 5§ asked for key cards in spades excluding the 
              club suit, and 6© would normally be an inquiry about the ©K. Whether 
              that is the meaning in the Americans’ bidding system, the 
              result was a leap to a no-play grand slam and a loss of 14 IMPs.  Halfway through the match, China had whittled the American’s 
              lead to 13.3 IMPs. The next deal could have swung the match to the 
              Chinese. 
             
              
                | Board 25. Dealer North. E/W 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª J 5 © 8 6 3 2
 ¨ A K 9 7 6
 § Q 9
 |  ª K 10 © A K 10
 ¨ 8 2
 § A J 10 8 6 3
 |  | ª 8 3 2 © J 9 7
 ¨ Q 10 5 4 3
 § K 5
 | 
|  | ª A Q 9 7 6 4 © Q 5 4
 ¨ J
 § 7 4 2
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Levin | Liping | Picus | Wenfei |   
                |  | Pass | Pass | 2¨ |   
                | 2NT | All Pass |  |  |  Wenfei’s 2¨ showed a weak two-bid in a major. Liping correctly 
              deduced that her partner’s suit was spades, and she started 
              with the ªJ. Wenfei ducked to Levin’s king. The contract was 
              very shaky. Levin could not afford to lose an early trick. It would 
              be down a lot if she did. At trick two, Levin put the §J on the 
              table, covered by North with the queen. Levin took the §K and advanced 
              the ©J, also covered, and she finished with 10 tricks for plus 180. 
              It might seem to have been an error for North cover the §J at trick 
              two, but Seamon-Molson, defending 3NT in the other room, said she 
              probably would have done the same, reasoning that West was unlikely 
              to have a six-card club suit and that the only chance was for her 
              partner to have four to the 8-7. 
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Yu | Seamon-Molson | Hongli | Sokolow |   
                |  | Pass | Pass | 2¨ |   
                | 2NT | Pass | 3NT | All Pass |  
              Seamon-Molson started with her fourth-best diamond, and Yu Zhang 
              considered her play for a long time before putting in dummy’s 
              10. Sokolow won the ¨J 
              and returned the ª9. 
              Yu played the king, the a club to the king and a club to the jack. 
              It was a disastrous decision. Seamon-Molson won the §Q, 
              cashed her top diamonds (Sokolow discarded a spade on one of them), 
              then played her ªJ 
              to the South hand. Instead of plus 600, declarer was minus 400. 
              It was an 11-IMP swing to USA I instead of a 10-IMP loss. The 21-IMP 
              swing was particularly meaningful in a match won by 19.3 IMPs.
                |  |  |  
                | Yu Zhang, China |  |   China managed an 11-IMP swing on t he next-to-last board, but 
              by then the margin was too great for them to overcome. The final 
              score was 229.3-210.  When the Chinese players entered the VuGraph auditorium after 
              the match, they received an hearty round of applause from the spectators 
              who had watched them fight valiantly on their way to a silver medal. |