Bermuda v Canada
Bermuda Bowl Round 17
The Bermuda Open team have had a tough tournament but it has had
its good moments. The pick of those was undoubtedly the Round 17
win over Canada. Here we show the three key swing deals which helped
Bermuda to their 22-8 VP victory.
Board 1. Dealer North. None
Vul. |
|
ª Q 6
© K 10
¨ K Q 2
§ A J 6 5 3 2 |
ª A K 5
© Q J 5 4 2
¨ 9 8 6 3
§ 7 |
|
ª J 10 9 7 4
© A 9 8 7 6
¨ A 10
§ 8 |
|
ª 8 3 2
© 3
¨ J 7 5 4
§ K Q 10 9 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Harvey |
|
Douglas |
|
|
1§ |
2§ |
2ª |
4© |
Pass |
Pass |
5§ |
5© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Smolski |
|
Petty |
|
1NT |
Dble |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
Pass |
4§ |
5§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Vera Petty, Bermuda |
North for Canada opened 1§
and Bermuda’s Alan Harvey made a Michaels cuebid. South showed
a constructive club raise and Ian Harvey jumped to the cold heart
game. When South sacrificed in 5§,
Harvey took the push to 5©,
where he was doubled. The opening lead was the king of diamonds
to dummy’s ace and Harvey led the ªJ
at trick two, rising with the ace when South followed low without
thought. The heart finesse won and the last heart was drawn and
now Harvey dropped the queen of spades to bring home his contract
with an overtrick; +750.
In the other room, Roman Smolski opened a strong no trump and
East doubled – one minor or both majors. Vera Petty showed
one minor and West cuebid, over which Smolski saved in 5§. That
was very much the winning decision as there were just four tricks
to be lost for –300 but 10 IMPs to Bermuda.
Board 4. Dealer West. All
Vul. |
|
ª J 10 7 4 3
© 9 5
¨ J 3
§ A 10 5 3 |
ª 8 6 2
© A K Q 10 6
¨ A 8 5
§ Q 7 |
|
ª A
© J 7 4
¨ K 10 7
§ K J 8 6 4 2 |
|
ª K Q 9 5
© 8 3 2
¨ Q 9 6 4 2
§ 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Harvey |
|
Douglas |
|
1© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Smolski |
|
Petty |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Two very simple auctions, both of which make perfect sense after
the opening bid (1© was Precision). Harvey’s 4© made twelve
tricks after a spade lead for +680. Smolski also led a spade against
3NT. Dummy’s bare ace won, perforce, and declarer crossed
to hand with a diamond to lead a cunning §7. Not cunning enough
on this occasion as Smolski hopped up with his ace and continued
spades; down one for –100 and 13 IMPs to Bermuda.
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S
Vul. |
|
ª A 9 8 6 3
© Q 6 5 2
¨ J 8
§ J 10 |
ª K J 7 5 2
© 10
¨ 6 5
§ A 7 6 3 2 |
|
ª Q 4
© A K J 4
¨ A 4 3
§ K Q 9 8 |
|
ª 10
© 9 8 7 3
¨ K Q 10 9 7 2
§ 5 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Harvey |
|
Douglas |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Smolski |
|
Petty |
|
|
|
2¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
4© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Harvey’s 2ª opening was simply a weak two bid. The five-one
split could have put the contract under serious threat had North
led a diamond to set up a force, but fortunately he chose the jack
of clubs and Harvey was in control. He just lost three trump tricks
for +420.
In the other room, Petty had a weak 2¨ opening at her disposal,
promising two of the top three honours, and used it. East simply
jumped to 3NT when that came around to him, a contract that would
have been an easy make. But now Smolski took an inspired view. His
partnership play that a double here would ask for a spade lead and
he took a gamble that I must confess would not have occurred to
me when he did indeed double. East had a serious worry about the
spades and guessed to run to 4©, doubled by Petty. How wonderful
for North/South! Had West realized what was going on he could have
corrected back to 4NT but he could not imagine that his partner
had bid a four-card suit – after all, the jump to 3NT would
more often than not be based on a long suit, would it not? He passed
and this bizarre contract drifted three off for –500. That
was another 14 IMPs to Bermuda, setting the seal on an excellent
victory.
|