USA II vs Poland
It has been many years since a woman participated in the Bermuda
Bowl, and no one can remember a woman ever getting to the semifinal
round of the event. Rose Meltzer of USA II, therefore, is breaking
new ground - and making the most of her opportunity. As play began
for the third semifinal session of the Bermuda Bowl, USA II led
the favored Polish team 63-61.
The Americans wasted no time adding to their margin - and it could
have been more.
Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª K Q 10 6 2
© A 10 8 3 2
¨ 10
§ 8 5 |
ª 9 8 3
© 9
¨ 9 7
§ K Q 7 6 4 3 2 |
|
ª A 7 4
© Q 6 5 4
¨ A K 8
§ A J 9 |
|
ª J 5
© K J 7
¨ Q J 6 5 4 3 2
§ 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
1ª |
Dble |
2¨ |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Perhaps Adam Zmudzinski was counting on clubs breaking badly for
declarer, considering his singleton. The double worked out badly,
however - Kyle Larsen had 10 tricks and soon was scoring up plus
650. The auction at the other table was vastly different - and declarer
landed in a contract that could have been defeated.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
Pass |
1§
(1) |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
5§ |
All Pass. |
|
|
(1) Polish club: possibly strong.
Lew Stansby started off with the ¨Q, taken by Marcin Lesniewski
in hand. He cashed the §A and played the §9 to dummy's king, followed
by dummy's singleton heart. Chip Martel could have sunk the contract
by playing low, but he played the ©A and switched to the ªK. Lesnieswki
ducked and won the spade continuation. He ruffed a heart, returned
to hand with the §J and played a third round of hearts. When the
king appeared, Lesniewski ruffed and claimed for plus 400 (discarding
the losing spade in dummy on the good ©Q). It was a 6-IMP loss,
but it could have been 12.
Both pairs got too high on the following deal - and both went down,
although it looked in the open room as though Lesniewski was going
to get it right.
Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª Q 5 4 3
© 5
¨ Q 8 6 5 2
§ A J 6 |
ª K
© A 10 7
¨ A K 7 4
§ K Q 8 5 4 |
|
ª A J 8 6
© K 9 8 6 2
¨ 9
§ 10 9 7 |
|
ª 10 9 7 2
© Q J 4 3
¨ J 10 3
§ 3 2 |
East played 5© at both tables after 1§ openings by West. Meltzer's
1§ opening was natural, Krzysztof Martens' was the Polish Club.
Eventually, both West's got around to Blackwood, officially getting
the partnership too high.
Full details of the play in the closed room were unavailable, but
Larsen finished down one for minus 100.
On Vugraph, Lesniewski had a chance to make the contract, but it
didn't work out. Stansby started with the ¨J, taken by the ace.
Lesniewski then ruffed a diamond and led a club to the king. Martel
ducked smoothly, and Lesniewski cashed the ¨K, pitching a club,
and exited dummy with a low club. Martel won the §J, thought about
his play for awhile, and continued with the ¨Q. Lesniewski ruffed
with the ©9, and the Vugraph analysts predicted that the defense
would prevail if Stansby declined to overruff. Stansby did ruff
with the queen, and now Lesniewski could make it by taking the right
view in hearts. He played a heart to the king and another to the
ace, however, and was down one.
The following deal featured a torturous auction that landed Lesniewski-Martens
in the wrong spot, but the opening lead rescued declarer.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª 10 5
© A 9 8 6 5 4 2
¨ 5
§ 10 8 5 |
ª A Q
© J 10 7
¨ A K J 7 6
§ 6 3 2 |
|
ª 9 7
© K
¨ Q 10 9 8 4 3
§ A J 7 4 |
|
ª K J 8 6 4 3 2
© Q 3
¨ 2
§ K Q 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
|
1ª |
1NT |
2© |
3NT |
All Pass |
Larsen's 3NT bid was a bold stroke - and it worked like a charm,
especially when Cezary Balicki led the ©5 to the king, and Zmudzinski
unblocked the queen. All of a sudden, Meltzer had 11 tricks and
plus 660. At the other table, the auction took its toll on East
and West.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
|
|
1ª |
1NT |
2© |
3© |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
Redbl |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
Neither Pole would own up to having a heart stopper, although the
two hands combined could stop the suit once. Martens' 3ª bid seemed
to be offering Lesniewski one last chance to bid 3NT, but he just
couldn't do it with a singleton king. After a protracted huddle
during which he appeared to be undergoing the tortures of the damned,
Lesniewski finally bid the diamond game. The next question was whether
Stansby could avoid the led of the ©Q, which would give the game
away. On the auction, it seemed impossible that he would lead anything
else, and in fact that is what he led. After all that, Lesniewski
used the heart suit - of all things - to discard two of his losing
clubs. Eleven tricks made for plus 600 and a loss of 2 IMPs.
The Americans picked up 11 IMPs on this deal because of a warning
from a Polish auction.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª A K J
© K Q 7 2
¨ A 8 5
§ J 8 4 |
ª Q 9 8 2
© 10 9
¨ K 10 9 6 2
§ A 5 |
|
ª 10 5
© A J 8 4 3
¨ Q 7 4 3
§ 7 6 |
|
ª 7 6 4 3
© 6 5
¨ J
§ K Q 10 9 3 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
One Club was Polish and the 1NT rebid showed a balanced hand of
18 or more high-card points.
Larsen didn't fancy leading a heart on the auction, so he found
the killing diamond lead. From there, declarer could do no better
than two down for minus 100. It wasn't as clear in the open room
that a heart lead might be dangerous.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
Dble |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Lesniewski knew Martel had heart values but it didn't have to be
four of them, so he made the normal-looking lead of a low heart.
Martel won and played a club to dummy's king, which was ducked.
Martens could not hold up a second time, and when he was in with
the §A, he switched futilely to the ¨K. Martel won and cashed his
club winners. Martens discarded down to the doubleton ªQ, so Martel
ended up with an overtrick. That was an 11-IMP gain for USA II.
On the following deal, the Americans' best opportunity for a big
gain slipped through their fingers and turned into a significant
loss.
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
ª 9 7
© J 5
¨ A Q J 8 5 4
§ J 6 2 |
ª Q 5 4 3
© K 4 2
¨ 10
§ A 8 7 5 3 |
|
ª A K J 10 2
© A 7
¨ K 9 7 6 2
§ Q |
|
ª 8 6
© Q 10 9 8 6 3
¨ 3
§ K 10 9 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Dble |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Stansby led the ¨3 to the ace, and Martel switched to a low spade.
Lesniewski won the ace and cashed the king. He was then able to
establish a long club in dummy via ruffs and claim 12 tricks.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
The Americans got to the good slam but didn't make it. Zmudzinski
led his singleton diamond to the ace, and Balicky switched to a
trump. Larsen won in hand and, possibly planning a crossruff, played
his §Q to the ace and ruffed a club. When he attempted to cash the
¨K, which he would do in trying the crossruff, Zmudzinski ruffed.
That was a winner Larsen needed for his slam, and although Larsen
could overruff in dummy, he finished a trick short for one down.
Instead of winning 13 IMPs for the slam swing, the team lost 13.
Both pairs reached slam on the following deal, but Lesniewski had
to sweat more to make his.
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
ª J 4
© 10 5 4
¨ 8 2
§ K J 10 8 6 2 |
ª A 10 8 7 5
© K 7 2
¨ A K Q 10
§ 4 |
|
ª Q
© A J 9 8 6
¨ 9 7 6 5
§ A Q 9 |
|
ª K 9 6 3 2
© Q 3
¨ J 4 3
§ 7 5 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
|
The club lead from South made Larsen's job relatively easy once
the reasonable splits in the red suits came to light. He needed
only to ruff one club in dummy to claim his slam - plus 980 for
USA II.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
|
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
Stansby started with a low spade, and Lesniewski won in dummy,
cashing two high diamonds, followed by a heart to his jack. Stansby
won the queen and got out with his ¨J. Lesniewski, without the resources
for two club ruffs - he couldn't afford to ruff with one of dummy's
face cards, anyway, unless the heart finesse worked - had no choice
but to take the club finesse. When it held, he could breath more
easily with plus 920. It was still a 2-IMP loss, but it would have
been 14 if the club finesse had been wrong.
Both teams were assessed late penalties of 2
IMPs, and the final net score of the set was 21-11 in favor of USA
II, still with high hopes of a Bermuda Bowl upset.
|