Wham, Slam, Thank You
Ma’ams
We usually only hear about the action at the top tables in the
Transnationals, but some of the best action can often occur lower
down the field. The BRIDGE PLUS team features players from Romania,
France, England and Sweden, and the English player was originally
Bulgarian while one of the Frenchmen insists that he is actually
not French at all but a Breton (the North-Western province of France)
– you can’t get much more transnational than that! All
three partnerships in the team are also of mixed gender.
Day Two of the event saw a number of slam swings in favour of
BRIDGE PLUS.
Round 5 - Board 15. Dealer
South. N/S Vul. |
|
ª 8 6
© Q 10 9 8 5 2
¨ K
§ K 9 5 3 |
ª A K 10 7 4
© 3
¨ J 5 4 3 2
§ Q 10 |
|
ª -
© K 7 4
¨ A Q 9 8 6
§ A J 6 4 2 |
|
ª Q J 9 5 3 2
© A J 6
¨ 10 7
§ 8 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jeaneteau |
|
Ryman |
|
|
|
|
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
Jenny Ryman, Sweden |
|
We have seen this deal before and know that a take-out double from
East works rather nicely. But Sweden’s Jenny Ryman did even
better with her 3ª
cuebid, initially asking partner to bid 3NT with a spade stopper.
That is what Yves Jeaneteau (the Frenchman) did, of course, but
the 4§ continuation
showed a good hand with both minors and now Jeaneteau blasted the
diamond slam.
It may appear that the slam requires two finesses, but it is not
quite so bad as that. Except on a club lead, declarer can try a
heart towards the king. When the ace is onside a club can be discarded
from hand, while whenever South has the ©A the club finesse is almost
sure to succeed, given the weak 2ª opening. Anyway, the bottom line
was that 6¨ proved to be quite cold for +920 and a double-figure
swing to BRIDGE PLUS.
Round 5 - Board 17. Dealer
North. None Vul. |
|
ª K 6
© K Q 9 7 4 3
¨ A 8 4
§ K 5 |
ª Q J 5 3 2
© J 6 2
¨ Q J 10 5 3
§ - |
|
ª 10 9 8 4
© A 10
¨ K 9 6 2
§ J 4 3 |
|
ª A 7
© 8 5
¨ 7
§ A Q 10 9 8 7 6 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Stegaroiu |
|
Marina |
|
1© |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
Marina Stegaroiu opened 1© and Bogdan Marina’s 2§ response
was either natural and game-forcing or a Drury-type. Two Hearts
confirmed a good opening hand and 3§ showed the game-force. When
Marina made a clear slam try by bidding 4§, Stegaroiu cuebid then
jumped to slam when Marina could show the ªA but deny the ©A; +920.
In the other room North/South bid 1© – 2§ – 2© –
5§ – Pass; 11 IMPs to BRIDGE PLUS.
Round 6 - Board 28. Dealer
West. N/S Vul. |
|
ª A K 10
© K Q 9 3
¨ 9 7 3
§ J 4 3 |
ª J 4
© 7 5
¨ Q J 6 5 4
§ K Q 9 6 |
|
ª 8 7 6 2
© J 4
¨ 8
§ A 10 8 7 5 2 |
|
ª Q 9 5 3
© A 10 8 6 2
¨ A K 10 2
§ - |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Ryman |
|
Jeaneteau |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5ª |
Pass |
5NT |
Pass |
6ª |
Pass |
7© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Four Clubs was a splinter bid and, when Ryman was willing to cuebid,
she presumably had little club wastage. Jeaneteau checked on key
cards, finding two plus the ©Q, then asked for kings. Six Spades
showed either the ªK, or both minor-suit kings. Obviously, Jeaneteau
could tell which option was actually held and now bid the grand
slam.
Seven Hearts is by no means secure, looking at the two hands,
but on the actual lie of the cards there were no problems and Jeaneteau
soon wrapped up 13 tricks for +2210.
At the other table, North opened a weak no trump, South transferred,
and West doubled the 2¨
bid. North completed the transfer and South jumped to game; +710
but 17 IMPs to BRIDGE PLUS.
Round 7 - Board 5. Dealer
North. N/S Vul. |
|
ª K 8 3
© Q J 9
¨ A 4
§ J 8 5 3 2 |
ª A Q J 7 6 5 2
© A 8 5
¨ 10
§ 7 6 |
|
ª 9
© 2
¨ K Q 8 7 2
§ A K Q 10 9 4 |
|
ª 10 4
© K 10 7 6 4 3
¨ J 9 6 5 3
§ - |
|
|
|
Marina Stegaroiu,
Romania |
The Romanian pairing of Marina/Stegaroiu reached 4ª
played by East after she had opened 2ª,
weak or strong with both minors. South led a low heart to dummy’s
ace and Stegaroiu led the singleton diamond towards her hand, North
rising with the ace and switching to a club for the ace, ruffed.
Back came a heart, ruffed in hand, and Stegaroiu played the two
winning diamonds to pitch dummy’s last heart and club. When
a diamond was ruffed and there was still the ªK
to lose the contract had to fail by a trick.
Declarer saw that there was a winning line after ruffing the heart
return, namely to ruff a diamond to get to dummy, cash the ace of
spades, then cash clubs to get rid of the last heart loser. Of course,
there was no reason to play that way, but you always worry after
going down in a contract where you see a line of play that would
have succeeded. Stegaroiu need not have worried as this was the
auction in the other room:
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Queran |
|
Senior |
|
Pass |
1§ |
3© |
3ª |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
One Club was strong and Nevena Senior decided that, facing a passed
partner, this was the time for a touch of aggression – who
looks at the vulnerability anyway? Five Clubs stressed that the
1§ opening was based on a good club suit rather than merely high
cards, and west raised to the small slam. Giles Queran (the Breton)
knew what to do to that.
Declarer got a fixation with the idea that South would have a
seven-card heart suit, even when that became virtually impossible,
and so dropped an unnecessary undertrick. The contract was down
three for –500 and 10 more IMPs to BRIDGE PLUS.
Having seen the above boards you might be wondering why BRIDGE
PLUS is not amongst the leading teams in the event. Alas, not every
board is a potential slam deal, or they might indeed be doing rather
well.
|