Canadian Shutout
Few observers would have picked Canada to defeat Italy in the semi-final
round of the 4th IOC Grand Prix, but the underdogs rallied for an
exciting victory Tuesday night. Not content with one surprise victory,
the Canadians were hard at work on another in the second set of
the final against the favored team from Poland. Not only was Canada
winning - they were thrashing the strong Polish team. Canada won
the second set 44-0 to lead by 46.5 IMPs at the halfway point.
The first deal was a missed opportunity for Poland.
Dealer South Both vul
|
|
ª 9 8
© A J 5
¨ A Q 6
§ A Q J 8 2 |
ª J
© 9 8 4 3 2
¨ 8 7 4 3
§ 10 9 5 |
|
ª A K Q 10 6 5
© ---
¨ K 10 5
§ K 7 6 3 |
|
ª 7 4 3 2
© K Q 10 7 6
¨ J 9 2
§ 4 |
In the closed room, Jacek Pszczola played in 2ª, making eight tricks
for plus 110. In the open room, Zmudzinski found himself in a vulnerable
game that, despite bad breaks, had plays.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gitelman |
Balicki |
Silver |
Zmudzinski |
|
1§ |
1ª |
Dble |
Pass |
2ª |
Dble |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
Fred Gitelman led the ªJ,
and Silver played the 10, suit preference for diamonds, and Gitelman
obliged. Zmudzinski put in dummy's ¨Q
and Silver won the king. He then cashed the ªA
and continued with the ªQ,
forcing dummy to ruff. Zmudzinski cashed the ©A,
getting the bad news in trumps, and continued with the ©J.
Looking at all the cards, one can see that the winning line is
to play a diamond to the 9, cash hearts, pitching the ¨A
and clubs, then the ¨J.
East will be squeezed in the black suits on the play of the ¨J.
Declarer would hold the ª7
and §4 in his hand,
while dummy would be down to the §A
Q. East would be holding the ªK
and the §K 7 with
no good discard.
Zmudzinski, however, apparently decided early in the play that
Gitelman was more likely to hold the §K,
so after picking up trumps he played a club to dummy's queen. Silver
won the king and had a spade to cash for two down and 3 IMPs to
Canada instead of 12 to Poland.
Gitelman played expertly on this deal to help his team to a major
swing.
Dealer West E/W vul
|
|
ª A 10
© K J 10 7 2
¨ 7 6 4
§ 6 3 2 |
ª K Q J 2
© A 6 3
¨ A 10 2
§ 9 8 5 |
|
ª 7 6 5 3
© 5
¨ K 9 8 3
§ K Q 10 4 |
|
ª 9 8 4
© Q 9 8 4
¨ Q J 5
§ A J 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kwiecen |
Gartaganis |
Pszczola |
Jones |
1§ |
1© |
1ª |
2§ |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
3© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
This must have been scary for Michal Kwiecen and Pszczola - scoring
only five tricks against the heart partial by Nick Gartaganis. Still,
the Poles prevailed and scored plus 100. At the other table, Gitelman
and Joe Silver found their way to a vulnerable game. All Gitelman
had to do was make it.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gitelman |
Balicki |
Silver |
Zmudzinski |
1§ |
2© |
Dble |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Cezary Balicki led the ¨6,
and Gitelman studied the dummy for a long time before starting to
play. Eventually, he played low, and won Zmudzinski's ¨J
with the ace. Gitelman then cashed the ©A,
ruffed a heart and played a spade to his king and Balicki's ace.
Balicki exited with his ª10
to Gitelman's queen. Gitelman then ruffed his last heart and played
a low diamond from dummy. Zmudzinski won the ¨Q
and played a fourth round of hearts, but Gitelman was able to ruff,
draw the last trump and claim, giving up only the §A
from there. That was plus 620 and 11 IMPs to Canada.
Just as Italy had suffered on slam swings against Canada, so did
the Poles. The final two deals of the set represented major setbacks
for Poland.
Dealer South Both vul
|
|
ª Q 7
© J 4
¨ A K 7 4
§ Q 9 8 6 5 |
ª K J 8 6 5 4
© Q 6 5 2
¨ 3 2
§ 10 |
|
ª 9 3 2
© 10
¨ J 9 8 6
§ K 7 4 3 2 |
|
ª A 10
© A K 9 8 7 3
¨ Q 10 5
§ A J |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kwiecen |
Gartaganis |
Pszczola |
Jones |
|
|
|
1© |
1ª |
Dble |
2ª |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
With his good spots and the fall of East's ©10, Peter Jones had
no trouble taking 12 tricks for plus 680. Would Poland be able to
engineer a slam swing of their own? It turned out that the answer
was yes, but not in the way that they wanted.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gitelman |
Balicki |
Silver |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
|
1§ |
2ª |
3ª |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Zmudzinski's 1§
opener was Polish, meaning it could be a minimum balanced hand or
any of a wide variety of strong, unbalanced hands. It appeared that,
after the 3ª cuebid,
South was to bid 3NT with a minimum and a spade stopper. Zmudzinski's
4© bid, therefore,
showed a strong hand. The way the auction developed might have worked
out all right for Poland were it not for the terrible break in clubs.
Still, it seems that Gitelman's 2ª
bid completely derailed North-South in auction.
Gitelman started with a low diamond to the jack and queen. Zmudzinski
cashed the §A and
followed with the jack, ducked by Silver. Now Zmudzinski was forced
to use a diamond entry to dummy to drive out the §K.
Silver won the third round of clubs and played the ©10.
Zmudzinski took the ©A
and, preparatory to squeezing West in the majors, cashed the ªA,
before going to dummy again with a diamond. Had that suit been 3-3,
Gitelman would indeed have been squeezed in the majors, but Zmudzinski
didn't have enough tricks. In the end, because he had failed to
unblock the ©J earlier,
Zmudzinski could not endplay Gitelman for down one by exiting with
dummy's ªQ. He had
to settle for minus 200 and a 13-IMP loss.
Looking at all four hands of the last deal, one can see that there
is no slam available. Nevertheless, slam was bid and made at four
of the eight tables in play (once doubled), including Canada and
Poland on Vugraph.
Dealer West None vul
|
|
ª A J 9 8 7 4 3
© 8 5
¨ ---
§ Q 8 6 3 |
ª K
© K 10 7
¨ Q 9 8 3 2
§ K 9 7 5 |
|
ª Q 10 2
© A J
¨ A K 10 7 6 5 4
§ 2 |
|
ª 6 5
© Q 9 6 4 3 2
¨ J
§ A J 10 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kwiecen |
Gartaganis |
Pszczola |
Jones |
Pass |
3ª |
3NT |
Pass |
4NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Pszczola finished with 11 tricks and plus 460.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gitelman |
Balicki |
Silver |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
4ª |
5¨ |
5ª |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
With one board to play, Poland had not scored an IMP in the set.
Balicki's aggressive 4ª
bid put his team in position to at least break the shutout. 5ª
doubled would have gone for minus 500, but one cannot blame Gitelman
for bidding on. His ªK
was worthless, but the rest of his hand was potentially very useful
to his partner.
Zmudzinski started with the ª5
(leading low from doubletons) to the king and ace, and Balicki had
to figure out the best chance to defeat the contract, if indeed
it could be defeated. Perhaps it did not occur to Balicki that the
slam could be beaten, for he took only a moment to continue with
the ©5. Silver claimed
at that point - his losing club would go on one of dummy's hearts
- the 10 if South covered East's jack, the king if he didn't.
The 10-IMP gain was fitting punctuation to a
rousing set by the upstart Canadians.
|