Eye on the prize - Part
2
At the halfway point of their Power Rosenblum match in the round
of 64, the Barry Rigal team held a useful 37-IMP lead against the
squad captained by Tony Forrester. You take nothing for granted,
of course, in any match, but that goes double when you have another
28 boards to play against a formidable pair like Forrester and Andrew
Robson.
Indeed, Forrester won the third set 42-30 to enter the final quarter
down by 25, not insurmountable by any means.
Rigal, playing with JoAnna Stansby, was regretting having missed
a key inference on this deal, which cost the team 5 IMPs in the
third set.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª K 4
© Q 9 3
¨ A K 10
§ A 10 7 5 4 |
ª Q 10 9 2
© 8
¨ Q 6 5 4 3
§ K J 8 |
|
ª A J 7 5
© K 10 7 6 4 2
¨ 7
§ Q 3 |
|
ª 8 6 3
© A J 5
¨ J 9 8 2
§ 9 6 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rigal |
|
Stansby |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
2¨
(1) |
Pass |
2© |
All Pass |
|
|
(1) One major.
Forrester led the ¨A
and switched to the ªK,
taken by Rigal in dummy. He played a club to the jack and ace and
won the spade return in hand. He realized later that he had enough
information at that point to have made his contract, but he went
wrong, playing heart to the king, losing to the ace. Forrester then
received his spade ruff and the defenders still had the ©J
and ©Q to come.
That was down one and a 6-IMP loss since East-West played in a spade
partial at the other table, making an overtrick.
Rigal realized that he could have made the contract for a 1-IMP
loss and that he had the clues he needed to find the correct line.
Since North by inference had the ¨K
to go with his ace and had shown up with the §A
and the ªK, he could
not have the ©A
as well. That would have put him outside his 1NT opening range.
Rigal's correct line, then, is to run the ©8
at trick five (it doesn't help for Forrester to cover with the 9),
losing to the jack. Robson can give Forrester his spade ruff, but
Rigal can later play the ©K,
pinning the queen and bringing home the awkward contract for plus
110.
Entering the final quarter, the Rigal team was hoping for a set
of flat board. They got anything but.
Paul Lewis and Danny Sprung, in the open room, started well against
David Bakhshi and Alexander Allfrey.
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª J 6 3
© K 10 6 4
¨ 2
§ K 8 7 4 2 |
ª 8 4
© 7 3
¨ A K Q J 10 9 8 5
§ 6 |
|
ª A K Q 10 7
© A J 9 8
¨ 7 6 3
§ J |
|
ª 9 5 2
© Q 5 2
¨ 4
§ A Q 10 9 5 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sprung |
Allfrey |
Lewis |
Bakhshi |
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4¨
(1) |
Pass |
5§
(2) |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
(1) Roman Key Card Blackwood
(2) Two keys plus the trump queen.
There was never going to be anything to the play, but the opening
lead would have repercussions for the Forrester team. Allfrey started
with a low spade, allowing Sprung to take all the tricks for plus
940. At the other table, Joann Sprung, playing with Connie Goldberg,
started with a low club, holding declarer to to12 tricks.
A couple of pushes followed, then the Rigal team gained 2 IMPs on
overtricks on a 3NT contract played at both tables.
Forrester gained 8 IMPs, however, when Lewis and Danny Sprung allowed
Bakhshi to make an overtrick in 2ª
while Forrester and Robson were plus 200 against a spade contract
in the other room. That was 8 IMPs to Forrester, now down 20.
Rigal gained another overtrick IMP when Danny Sprung made 12 tricks
in 5§, while Joann
and Goldberg held declarer to 11 tricks in the same contract.
Boards 26 and 27 were significant losses for Rigal - and they both
involved doubles.
Board 26. Dealer East. All Vul.
|
|
ª -
© Q 8 7 5
¨ 10 9 8
§ J 8 5 4 3 2 |
ª 9 8
© 9 6
¨ Q 6 5 4
§ A K 9 7 6 |
|
ª A J 7 6 4 2
© A K 10 4 3 2
¨ J
§ - |
|
ª K Q 10 5 3
© J
¨ A K 7 3 2
§ Q 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sprung |
Allfrey |
Lewis |
Bakhshi |
|
|
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Bakhshi's double seems entirely normal with his trump holding behind
declarer - plus the top two diamonds. The defenders might have beaten
Lewis three tricks, but they were not unhappy with plus 500. At
the other table, Goldberg inexplicably passed, collecting only plus
200. That was 7 IMPs to Forrester.
The next board was an even bigger loss.
Board 27. Dealer South. None Vul.
|
|
ª K Q 8 6 5
© J 9 3
¨ K
§ K 8 7 3 |
ª 9 4 3
© K Q 6 2
¨ 10 8 6 3
§ 9 2 |
|
ª 7
© 8 7 5 4
¨ A Q J 9 7 5 2
§ 5 |
|
ª A J 10 2
© A 10
¨ 4
§ A Q J 10 6 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sprung |
Allfrey |
Lewis |
Bakhshi |
|
|
|
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
3¨ |
4¨ |
5¨ |
5ª |
All Pass |
|
Bakhshi's 4¨ bid
should have given Allfrey enough impetus to bid the cold slam, but
it didn't happen, and he was annoyed at the possibility of an 11-IMP
loss should Joann Sprung and Goldberg bid it at the other table.
The auction was much the same in the closed room, but when West
bid 5¨, Joann doubled.
There were only three tricks for the defense, however, and plus
100 was decidedly disappointing. That was 9 IMPs to Forrester, now
within 5 IMPs.
Forrester gained another IMP on the next board to get to within
4.
Since Forrester gained 4 IMPs on the last deal, the next-to-last
deal provided the winning margin for Rigal.
Board 29. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
ª A 10 8 7
© 10 4
¨ A Q 9 2
§ Q 4 3 |
ª 5
© A K Q J 6 2
¨ 6 5
§ A K 8 7 |
|
ª K Q 4 3
© 8 7 5
¨ J 7 4 3
§ 10 9 |
|
ª J 9 6 2
© 9 3
¨ K 10 8
§ J 6 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Sprung |
Allfrey |
Lewis |
Bakhshi |
|
1¨ |
Pass |
1ª |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Allfrey led the ªA,
then switched to the ¨2.
Bakshi won the ¨K
and, unable to diagnose Allfrey's plan, switched to a club. That
was all Sprung needed to get home with the overtrick that decided
the match. He won the §A,
cashed two trumps, then ruffed a club and pitched his other club
loser and diamond loser on the top spades.
At the other table, Joann Sprung led the ªA,
but she allowed for no slips by the defense when she cashed the
¨A and played a second
diamond to her partner's king. That was minus 420 and a 1-IMP gain
in match whose final score was 121-120.
|