Double Endplay
By Barry Rigal
As we have seen before, England's Hackett twins are dangerous adversaries,
partly due to their aggressive approach in the auction. This deal
was a case in point.
|
|
ª K Q 8 3
© 5 2
¨ J 8 3
§ A 7 6 3 |
ª A 9 2
© J 10 4 3
¨ Q 5
§ K 10 9 5 |
|
ª J 7 5 4
© K
¨ K 10 9 7 6 2
§ 8 4 |
|
ª 10 6
© A Q 9 8 7 6
¨ A 4
§ Q J 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Jason |
|
Justin |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When you bid them up you have to play them up. Jason's 3©
bid might look a little forward but 4©
was a fair spot. On the lead of the ten of clubs Justin ducked in
dummy and East contributed a standard-count eight.
A spade to the queen scored as East started an echo, and a trump
was led to the king and ace. Justin took this and played a second
spade up and East won his ace and exited with a third spade, allowing
Justin to pitch his losing diamond. Justin crossed to the ace of
diamonds then led the ©9
from hand. West won and was endplayed for the first time, obliged
to lead his remaining diamond as either a heart or a club would
give a trick immediately. Justin ruffed the diamond and played queen
and another heart and West was endplayed for the second time. Having
used up his only safe exit card after the previous endplay, he was
now obliged to lead away from the king of clubs and Justin had held
his losers to three. Nicely done, though West could have defeated
the contract had he switched to a diamond when in with the ace of
spades.
Missed chances
The team captained by Roy Welland has made its mark in recent major
ACBL tournament, including a victory last fall in the tough Reisinger
Board-a-Match Teams.
The squad - Welland, Bjorn Fallenius, Fred Gitelman, Brad Moss,
Howard Weinstein and Steve Garner - started well, chalking up 49
Victory Points in their first two matches of the round robin.
The team fell on hard times after that, however, and could look
back on two losses - to Poddar of India and Abram of the Netherlands
- as the killers. When all was said and done in the round robin,
Welland was in fifth place, one Victory Point out of the qualifying
fourth spot. Just ahead of them were Poddar at 149 and Abram at
152.5.
Despite their difficulties in the middle matches of the round robin,
Welland had a chance with one round to go. They had scored 23 and
24 VPs in the seventh and eighth matches to lie fourth, half a VP
ahead of Abram.
The Welland team had their work cut out for them, however, as their
final match was against the Polish team captained by Wojtek Olanski,
who were leading the group by a healthy margin.
Welland won the match 48-44, but it was not enough as Abram beat
Poddar by 30 IMPs to surge into third place. Welland needed 6 more
IMPs against Olanski to continue playing in the Power Rosenblum.
This deal was especially annoying for Gitelman and Moss, who faced
Boguslaw Gierulski and Jerzy Skrzpczak in the first half.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª 8 5
© J 9 8
¨ K Q 10 7 6 4 3
§ 6 |
ª K 10 7
© A 5 4
¨ 8 2
§ J 9 7 5 3 |
|
ª A Q 6 4 3 2
© 6
¨ J
§ A Q 8 4 2 |
|
ª J 9
© K Q 10 7 3 2
¨ A 9 5
§ K 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gitelman |
Skrzpczak |
Moss |
Gierulski |
|
|
|
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
2ª |
3© |
3ª |
4© |
4ª |
Pass |
Pass |
5© |
All Pass |
|
Had Gitelman or Moss doubled, they would have collected plus 500,
a 4-IMP loss instead of the 10 they lost (East-West collected plus
650 at the other table in their spade game). If North's 1ª
bid was genuine, however, it was likely that South was void in the
suit, so doubling 5©
was not clear cut.
Perhaps spurred by the poor result on that board, Gitelman and
Moss got it back on the next deal.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª 6 4 2
© 5
¨ K Q 8 6 2
§ K J 10 9 |
ª Q 5
© A 9 6 3
¨ A 5 3
§ 8 7 4 2 |
|
ª K J 10 9 8 3
© K Q J 8 7
¨ J 4
§ --- |
|
ª A 7
© 10 4 2
¨ 10 9 7
§ A Q 6 5 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Gitelman |
Skrzpczak |
Moss |
Gierulski |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
North's failure to double the 4¨ cuebid is curious - and he certainly
had reason to regret the decision when his partner started the defense
against the slam with the §A. Moss ruffed and could claim as soon
as both opponents followed to the first round of trumps. Moss had
12 tricks via five trumps in hand, five spades, the ¨A and a diamond
ruff.
Nicely Bid
The COPE team representing South Africa just missed out on qualification
for the K.O. stages of the Power Rosenblum, finishing fifth in their
group. However, the relatively inexperienced pairing at this level
of Alan Apteker and Bernard Donde had a nice auction to slam on
this deal against ROUSSEL of France.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª 6
© A Q 10 7 6 4
¨ K 8 3
§ 7 5 2 |
ª 8 7 4 3
© 9 3
¨ A 7
§ K 9 6 4 3 |
|
ª A K Q 9 5 2
© -
¨ Q 10 6 4 2
§ A J |
|
ª J 10
© K J 8 5 2
¨ J 9 5
§ Q 10 8 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Donde |
|
Apteker |
|
Pass |
2© |
4¨ |
4© |
4ª |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
5© |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl |
Pass |
6§ |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
Two Hearts was weak and 4¨
showed diamonds and spades. The latter bid could have been made
on quite a bit less than Apteker actually held so when Donde bid
4ª freely he felt
justified in making a try for slam. There was no problem in the
play, of course, and the South Africans were soon chalking up +980.
At the other table the French East player overcalled
4ª and it went 5©
- 5ª - All Pass,
so COPE picked up 11 IMPs.
|