Mixed Qualifying Session
Three
With one qualifying session to play in the Mixed Pairs, many pairs
were fighting to get into the qualifying places while others were
secure and looking to maximize their carry-over - a significant
factor as it carries the weight of a full session in the final.
Having picked a very dull series of boards in the first session,
my choice proved to be much more lively this time.
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª Q
© K J 8 4
¨ J 8 5
§ J 9 7 6 5 |
ª A 10 9 8 5
© 6 5 3
¨ A Q 6 4
§ 2 |
|
ª K 7 6 2
© Q 9
¨ 10 7 3
§ A Q 10 4 |
|
ª J 4 3
© A 10 7 2
¨ K 9 2
§ K 8 3 |
At my first table the deal was passed out by Gary & Jan Soules/Barry
Rigal & Sue Picus - not a great start to my day. However, there
was more action when I watched the deal for a second time.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Thuillez |
Forrester |
Thuillez |
Wei-Sender |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Pascale Thuillez's 3NT response to husband Laurent's opening bid
showed a balanced four-card raise to game. Not surprisingly, Laurent
had no interest in going beyond game. Tony Forrester led the §7
and Laurent won dummy's ace and had to pick up the trumps without
loss to bring home his contract, given that the diamond suit was
lying favourably. A lot of matchpoints swung on declarer's play.
Forrester's opening lead was unclear but looked as though it might
be from shortage and it seemed normal to start with the ªA from
hand. There was an unavoidable spade loser now and Thuillez was
down one for -50.
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª J 3
© Q 9 3
¨ A J 10
§ A Q J 6 3 |
ª Q 5 4
© A 4
¨ K 6 4 2
§ 10 7 5 2 |
|
ª A K 10 9 8 7 2
© 8 7
¨ Q 9 3
§ K |
|
ª 6
© K J 10 6 5 2
¨ 8 7 5
§ 9 8 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Soules |
Rigal |
Soules |
Picus |
Pass |
1NT |
2§ |
2¨ |
Dble |
2© |
2ª |
3© |
3ª |
4§ |
4ª |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Thuillez |
Forrester |
Thuillez |
Wei-Sender |
Pass |
1NT |
2© |
2NT |
3ª |
4§ |
4ª |
All Pass |
In the first auction Jan Soules' 2§
overcall showed any single-suiter. Two Diamonds was a transfer and
the double showed some diamonds and values. In the second auction,
2© was a transfer
overcall and 2NT Lebensohl. Forrester's 4§
bid showed willingness to compete in whichever suit his partner
held.
Sue Picus led the king of hearts and Jan Soules won the ace, drew
two rounds of trumps and played a diamond to her queen. She exited
with a heart and Picus won and switched to a club. Rigal won and
played back the §J.
Declarer could ruff but had no option but to pray for a doubleton
ace of diamonds; down one for -100.
Forrester led the jack of spades. Thuillez won the ace and cashed
the king, on which Kathie Wei-Sender threw the §9,
reverse. Declarer played the §K,
Wei-Sender following with the eight, and Forrester won the ace.
A heart switch defeats the contract, and perhaps Wei-Sender intended
the second club as suit preference for hearts. But if declarer had
©KJ rather than
the ace, Forrester did not wish to open up the suit. If partner
held the §7, a second
club would be safe, and after some thought he played the §Q.
Thuillez ruffed that and crossed to hand with a trump to lead the
§7. Forrester covered
and a few seconds later declarer had claimed ten tricks, the heart
loser disappearing on the established club; +620 and a lot of matchpoints
for the French pair.
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª J 6 3
© K 9 7 6 5 4
¨ 3
§ A 10 8 |
ª K 10 9 5 4
© 8
¨ A 5 4 2
§ K Q J |
|
ª Q 8 7
© Q J 10 2
¨ J 9 8
§ 9 5 3 |
|
ª A 2
© A 3
¨ K Q 10 7 6
§ 7 6 4 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Peel |
Rigal |
Topp |
Picus |
|
2© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Katz |
Lev |
Katz |
Sokolow |
|
2¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
North's heart suit is nothing to get excited about but we would
all open with a weak two bid at this vulnerability, as did Rigal
and Lev. Picus enquired and, on finding that she faced a maximum
hand but with a bad suit, bid game. This looks very aggressive to
me and it resulted in a very poor game being reached.
Gretchen Topp found the best lead of a club and Stephen Peel was
allowed to hold the first trick with the jack. He continued with
the §K to the ace
and Rigal played a diamond to king and ace. Peel cashed the club
then exited with a diamond. Rigal drew two rounds of trumps and
got his spades away on the minor-suit winners, but the two trump
losers meant that he was down two for -100.
Tobi Sokolow responded 3©,
pass or correct, to Sam Lev's multi. Ralph Katz doubled for take-out
and Martha converted that to penalties. The club lead was easier
to find with South as declarer. Sokolow won immediately and led
the diamond to the king and ace. Katz cashed the §J
then §Q before switching
to a spade for the jack, queen and ace. Again, declarer could avoid
a spade loser, but the bad trump split meant down one for -100.
Board 18. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 6 5
© Q 8 6 2
¨ A 6 3
§ Q J 4 3 |
ª K 10
© A 9 7 3
¨ K Q J 5
§ 9 6 2 |
|
ª A Q 9 8 7
© K 10 5
¨ 10 4
§ K 8 5 |
|
ª J 4 3 2
© J 4
¨ 9 8 7 2
§ A 10 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Peel |
Rigal |
Topp |
Picus |
|
|
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Katz |
Lev |
Katz |
Sokolow |
|
|
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Topp's 1NT opening was 10-14 and her 3ª
bid accepted the game invitation while showing the fifth spade.
Picus led a top of nothing diamond and Rigal won the ace to switch
to the queen of clubs. That was ducked so he continued with a low
club. Declarer has only eight winners even if she guesses to play
low on this trick, short of some inspiration in spades. Play was
speeded up considerably when Topp rose with the king and the defence
cashed out for one down; -50.
With dummy having bid diamonds, there was a serious danger that
Sokolow would give a trick on the opening lead - diamonds are the
only safe suit to lead. Sure enough, she chose the jack of hearts,
and now declarer had a chance. Katz took a long time to play to
trick one before finally winning dummy's ace and playing on diamonds.
Lev ducked the diamond twice and now Katz decided finesse the ©10
then switch her attention to spades. When the suit failed to behave
as required, she played a fourth round to Sokolow's jack. Sokolow
put Lev in with the ace of diamonds and he switched to the queen
of clubs. When declarer covered the first club, the defence had
the rest of the tricks as Lev had kept nothing but clubs; down two
for -100.
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª 8
© A J 9 8
¨ A 8 3
§ K 10 5 4 2 |
ª A K 4
© Q 7 5 4 2
¨ 2
§ Q 9 6 3 |
|
ª 10 7 3 2
© 10 3
¨ K Q 7 6 4
§ A J |
|
ª Q J 9 6 5
© K 6
¨ J 10 9 5
§ 8 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weichsel |
Lev |
Meltzer |
Sokolow |
|
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Thuillez |
Ewashkiw |
Thuillez |
St. Amant |
|
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2NT |
All Pass |
Both Wests thought that their hand was worth an opening bid despite
the vulnerability and lack of intermediates. Peter Weichsel made
the normal American rebid of 2ª
while Laurent Thuillez made the normal French rebid of 2§
- the French are very keen on four-card support for an immediate
raise.
The French auction saw Pascale rebid 2NT, which she managed to
bring home after a diamond lead to the ace and a diamond back; +120.
Lev passed over 1©
but then made a take-out double when the opposition found a fit
in his short suit. Sokolow was happy to pass with her excellent
spade holding. She led the jack of diamonds to the ace and Lev switched
to his trump. Rose Meltzer won the king of spades and played a club
to the jack then cashed the §A
and ¨KQ. She ruffed
a diamond low next but when she now tried for a club ruff in hand
Sokolow could over-ruff and return a trump to the bare king. That
was one down for -200.
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª 9 2
© A J 6 3
¨ J 10 9 8 6
§ K 6 |
ª Q J 4
© K 2
¨ 2
§ Q J 10 8 7 5 3 |
|
ª A 10 8 6 5 3
© 10 9 8 4
¨ 5
§ 9 4 |
|
ª K 7
© Q 7 5
¨ A K Q 7 4 3
§ A 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weichsel |
Lev |
Meltzer |
Sokolow |
3§ |
Pass |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Thuillez |
Ewashkiw |
Thuillez |
St. Amant |
3§ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
5© |
All Pass |
|
When Weichsel's pre-empt came around to her, Sokolow made what
looks to be the normal call of 3NT, where she played. Weichsel led
a club and Sokolow won in hand and started to run the diamonds.
After following to one diamond each, West threw four spades while
East threw four clubs. Now Sokolow had a unfortunate physical lapse
when she pulled the §2
instead of the last diamond. Of course, although she spotted the
error immediately, the card was played. A spade towards her hand
would have allowed Sokolow to make no less than twelve tricks, but
she had convinced herself that the ªA
was offside and instead tried the jack of hearts, the idea being
to create an entry to hand with the ©Q.
When Weichsel had the heart and could cash a club, Sokolow had an
awkward discard and chose the winning diamond as Meltzer threw another
spade. Weichsel exited with a heart and Sokolow again went wrong,
winning in hand and trying to split the hearts rather than winning
in dummy to lead to the ªK.
That meant she made only nine tricks for a very poor score.
The play of the ©J
looks wrong as if the ªA
is with West then surely the ©K
will be with East and a spade will come through the king. Better
to just play for the ªA
to be onside - but it is easy to lose a little concentration after
making one of these once-a-year physical slips.
Canadian pair Malcom Ewashkiw and Charlotte St.
Amant reached an uncomfortable spot when St. Amant chose to make
a take-out double of 3§
rather than overcall 3NT. When Ewashkiw jumped to 4©,
St.Amant could see that slam might be possible opposite the right
hand - as little as ©AKxxx,
perhaps - and made a slam try, which Ewashkiw quickly rejected.
Ewashkiw won the club lead in dummy to take the heart finesse and
was delighted to find the doubleton king onside. He switched his
attention to diamonds now and there was nothing the defence could
do; eleven tricks for +650.
|