| Egypt v Brazil/Argentina 
              – Senior Bowl Round 6  The combined Brazil/Argentina team representing Zone 3 met Egypt 
              with both teams starting their Round 6 match a little below average. 
              It was important for both to get a good win under their belts. 
             
              
                | Board 2. Dealer East. N/S 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª A 6 4 2 © A 8 4
 ¨ K J 7
 § 9 7 4
 |  ª K 9 5 © 9 7
 ¨ 10 9 8
 § K Q 10 6 5
 |  | ª J 10 3 © J 10 6
 ¨ 6 5 4
 § J 8 3 2
 | 
|  | ª Q 8 7 © K Q 5 3 2
 ¨ A Q 3 2
 § A
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                |  |  | Pass | 1© |   
                | Pass | 1ª | Pass | 2¨ |   
                | Pass | 4© | Pass | 4NT |   
                | Pass | 5© | Pass | 6© |   
                | All Pass |  |  |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                |  |  | Pass | 1© |   
                | Pass | 2§ | Pass | 2¨ |   
                | Pass | 4© | All Pass |  |  
              In response to the 1© 
              opening, Mohsen Kamel bid naturally, showing his spade suit then 
              raising to the heart game. The partial spade fit convinced Mohamed 
              Shaker to take control and bid the slam. Six Hearts is sub-par, 
              of course, a sit requires both a heart split and favourable spade 
              position. Shaker got the first part of that but when he led up to 
              the ªQ he found 
              the king offside and was down one for –100.
                |  |  |  
                |  | Gabriel Chagas, 
                    Brazil |   I am not aware of any systemic requirement to explain Gabriel 
              Chagas’s 2§ response at the other table. If he simply intended 
              to inhibit a club lead then he did not succeed in that goal, though 
              the lead was irrelevant, but perhaps his choice of response helped 
              Pedro Paolo Assumpcao to pass the 4© rebid; +650 and 13 IMPs to 
              Brazil/Argentina. 
             
              
                | Board 3. Dealer South. E/W 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª 6 3 2 © A K 8
 ¨ Q 9 4
 § A 8 6 4
 |  ª A © Q 9 7 5 4 3 2
 ¨ A 6
 § K Q 3
 |  | ª K Q 9 7 4 © 6
 ¨ K 8 5 2
 § J 10 9
 | 
|  | ª J 10 8 5 © J 10
 ¨ J 10 7 3
 § 7 5 2
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                |  |  |  | Pass |   
                | 1© | Pass | 1ª | Pass |   
                | 2© | All Pass |  |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                |  |  |  | Pass |   
                | 1© | Pass | 1ª | Pass |   
                | 2§ | Pass | 2¨ | Pass |   
                | 3© | Pass | 3NT | Pass |   
                | 4© | All Pass |  |  |  The Egyptian East/West pair got too high when Wael Wattar felt 
              that his hand fell someway in between a 2© and 3© rebid so invented 
              a club suit then repeated the hearts. Four Hearts had to fail by 
              a trick; -100.  Martin Monsegur contented himself with a top-weight 2© rebid and 
              was left to play there for a comfortable +140 and 6 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina. 
             
              
                | Board 4. Dealer West. All 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª K 7 6 4 © A J 6 5 3 2
 ¨ 3
 § K Q
 |  ª 5 3 © K Q 8 7
 ¨ J 4 2
 § 9 8 5 4
 |  | ª Q J 10 9 © 9
 ¨ A K 8
 § J 10 7 3 2
 | 
|  | ª A 8 2 © 10 4
 ¨ Q 10 9 7 6 5
 § A 6
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                | Pass | 1© | Dble | Rdbl |   
                | Pass | 2© | Pass | 3© |   
                | Pass | 4© | All Pass |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                | Pass | 1© | Pass | 2¨ |   
                | Pass | 2© | Pass | 3¨ |   
                | All Pass |  |  |  |  Kamel’s 2© rebid showed the standard minimum handtype with 
              six hearts and it seems aggressive that Shaker invited game. It 
              was perhaps a little unfortunate that the club values were not pulling 
              their weight, but 4© always rated to be a thin contract and so it 
              proved. Guillermo Mooney led the queen of spades to dummy’s 
              ace and Kamel playe dtwo more rounds of spades. Back came a club 
              and he won and cashed the other club winner before ruffing his last 
              spade with dummy’s ©10. Monsegur over-ruffed and played a 
              diamond to his partner’s king. With no entry to dummy, there 
              were two more hearts to lose for down two; -200.  Abdel Samie did not double the opening bid at the other table 
              and Assumpcao followed an invitational sequence focusing on diamonds. 
              There were three trump losers plus a heart and a spade; down one 
              for –100 but 3 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina. 
             
              
                | Board 5. Dealer North. N/S 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª 9 7 © 7 6 3
 ¨ A K J 9 4
 § 9 6 4
 |  ª 10 8 5 © J 9 5 4
 ¨ 6 5
 § Q 7 5 2
 |  | ª A K 6 2 © A K 8
 ¨ Q 8 7
 § J 8 3
 | 
|  | ª Q J 4 3 © Q 10 2
 ¨ 10 3 2
 § A K 10
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                |  | Pass | 1§ | Pass |   
                | 1¨ | Pass | 1NT | Dble |   
                | Pass | 2¨ | All Pass |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                |  | Pass | 1NT | All Pass |  Samie opened 1NT and was left to play there. After a diamond lead 
              he managed to find a way to seven tricks for +90.  Mooney had to open 1§ and rebid in no trump and now Shaker doubled 
              to show an opening hand including some club length. Kamel removed 
              that to 2¨ and played there on the lead of a top spade. Mooney switched 
              to a club and kamel won the ace and crossed to a top diamond. It 
              looks right to play a spade now, thereby preserving a later trump 
              entry to hand, but Kamel cashed the second diamond first. Had Mooney 
              gone up with the ªK there would have been eight easy tricks but 
              he correctly played low and dummy’s queen scored. Kamel ruffed 
              a spade then played a heart to Mooney’s king. Mooney cashed 
              the ¨Q and played a club and Kamel ducked to the queen. Monsegur 
              returned a heart and Kamel had eight tricks for +90 and a flat board. 
             
              
                | Board 6. Dealer East. E/W 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª 8 5 © K J 9 4 3 2
 ¨ A 9
 § K Q 8
 |  ª 9 6 © Q 7 6 5
 ¨ K 6 4
 § J 9 5 3
 |  | ª A K J 4 2 © -
 ¨ Q 8 3 2
 § A 6 4 2
 | 
|  | ª Q 10 7 3 © A 10 8
 ¨ J 10 7 5
 § 10 7
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                |  |  | 1ª | Pass |   
                | Pass | Dble | Pass | 1NT |   
                | Pass | 2© | Pass | 3© |   
                | Pass | 4© | All Pass |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                |  |  | 1ª | Pass |   
                | 1NT | 2© | All Pass |  |  Kamel’s double then bid 2© combination looks too much and 
              it got him too high. Mooney cashed a top spade then switched to 
              a diamond for the king and ace so there was no danger of a defensive 
              slip-up. Kamel won the diamond and played a spade up and Mooney 
              won then cashed his black winners before exiting with a club. When 
              declarer got the trumps wrong he was down two for –100.  Wattar responded with the West cards and Chagas made a simple 
              overcall. Two Hearts made exactly on a similar line of play for 
              +110 and 5 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina. 
             
              
                | Board 10. Dealer East. All 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª K 7 4 © K 9 7 5 3
 ¨ Q
 § 8 7 6 4
 |  ª A Q © Q 8 6 4
 ¨ K 9 3 2
 § K 10 9
 |  | ª J 6 5 3 © A J 2
 ¨ J 7 6
 § Q J 5
 | 
|  | ª 10 9 8 2 © 10
 ¨ A 10 8 5 4
 § A 3 2
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                |  |  | Pass | Pass |   
                | 1¨ | Pass | 1ª | Pass |   
                | 1NT | All Pass |  |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                |  |  | Pass | Pass |   
                | 1NT | Pass | 2§ | Pass |   
                | 2© | Pass | 3NT | All Pass |  Monsegur showed a weak no trump type and played in 1NT on a low 
              heart lead, which he ran to his queen. Declarer tried the ªQ from 
              hand and that was allowed to hold the trick. Next he played a heart 
              to the jack followed by a club to the king and a second round to 
              the jack and ace. Back came a spade. Monsegur took his winners then 
              led to the ¨K for an overtrick; +120.  Wattar stretched his hand and was raised to 3NT via Stayman. Chagas 
              led a spade to the queen but that gave declarer nothing he could 
              not do for himself. On this lie of the cards there was no way to 
              come to nine tricks and the contract actually went two down for 
              –200 and 8 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina. 
             
              
                | Board 12. Dealer West. N/S 
                    Vul. |  
|  | ª A K J 10 © Q 4 2
 ¨ Q 9 8 6
 § 8 6
 |  ª 9 6 2 © J 10 7
 ¨ 5
 § J 10 5 4 3 2
 |  | ª Q 8 5 4 3 © 8 6 3
 ¨ K J 10
 § A K
 | 
|  | ª 7 © A K 9 5
 ¨ A 7 4 3 2
 § Q 9 7
 |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Monsegur | Kamel | Mooney | Shaker |   
                | Pass | 1¨ | 1ª | Dble |   
                | 2ª | 2NT | Pass | 3ª |   
                | Pass | 3NT | All Pass |  |  
             
               
                | West | North | East | South |   
                | Wattar | Chagas | Samie | Assumpcao |   
                | Pass | 1¨ | 1ª | 2© |   
                | 2ª | 3© | 3ª | 4¨ |   
                | Pass | 4© | All Pass |  |  I am not convinced that Kamel’s 2NT bid shows a mere weak 
              no trump but the Egyptians managed to get to a making game when 
              he repeated no trump at his next turn. Shaker thought for some time 
              before passing but eventually came to the winning decision. Mooney 
              led a spade to the nine and jack and Kamel led the ¨9 for ten and 
              ace then a second round to the eight and jack. The fortunate (or 
              unfortunate according to your perspective) club position left the 
              defence powerless. When Mooney switched to a heart then played a 
              second heart on winning the next diamond declarer had ten tricks 
              for +630.  Assumpcao made the strange decision to bid his four-card heart 
              suit and it was normal, even looking at that spade holding, for 
              Chagas to raise the hearts then choose to play 4© rather than 5¨ 
              - not that it mattered once 3NT had been left behind. Four Hearts 
              went two down for –200 and 13 IMPs to Egypt, a little relief 
              at the end of a poor set for them.Brazil/Argentina led by 37-14 at the half and increased their margin 
              of victory to 65-31, 21-9 VPs at the end of the match.
 |