Egypt v Brazil/Argentina
– Senior Bowl Round 6
The combined Brazil/Argentina team representing Zone 3 met Egypt
with both teams starting their Round 6 match a little below average.
It was important for both to get a good win under their belts.
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S
Vul. |
|
ª A 6 4 2
© A 8 4
¨ K J 7
§ 9 7 4 |
ª K 9 5
© 9 7
¨ 10 9 8
§ K Q 10 6 5 |
|
ª J 10 3
© J 10 6
¨ 6 5 4
§ J 8 3 2 |
|
ª Q 8 7
© K Q 5 3 2
¨ A Q 3 2
§ A |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
Gabriel Chagas,
Brazil |
In response to the 1©
opening, Mohsen Kamel bid naturally, showing his spade suit then
raising to the heart game. The partial spade fit convinced Mohamed
Shaker to take control and bid the slam. Six Hearts is sub-par,
of course, a sit requires both a heart split and favourable spade
position. Shaker got the first part of that but when he led up to
the ªQ he found
the king offside and was down one for –100.
I am not aware of any systemic requirement to explain Gabriel
Chagas’s 2§ response at the other table. If he simply intended
to inhibit a club lead then he did not succeed in that goal, though
the lead was irrelevant, but perhaps his choice of response helped
Pedro Paolo Assumpcao to pass the 4© rebid; +650 and 13 IMPs to
Brazil/Argentina.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W
Vul. |
|
ª 6 3 2
© A K 8
¨ Q 9 4
§ A 8 6 4 |
ª A
© Q 9 7 5 4 3 2
¨ A 6
§ K Q 3 |
|
ª K Q 9 7 4
© 6
¨ K 8 5 2
§ J 10 9 |
|
ª J 10 8 5
© J 10
¨ J 10 7 3
§ 7 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
|
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2© |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
|
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
The Egyptian East/West pair got too high when Wael Wattar felt
that his hand fell someway in between a 2© and 3© rebid so invented
a club suit then repeated the hearts. Four Hearts had to fail by
a trick; -100.
Martin Monsegur contented himself with a top-weight 2© rebid and
was left to play there for a comfortable +140 and 6 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina.
Board 4. Dealer West. All
Vul. |
|
ª K 7 6 4
© A J 6 5 3 2
¨ 3
§ K Q |
ª 5 3
© K Q 8 7
¨ J 4 2
§ 9 8 5 4 |
|
ª Q J 10 9
© 9
¨ A K 8
§ J 10 7 3 2 |
|
ª A 8 2
© 10 4
¨ Q 10 9 7 6 5
§ A 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
Pass |
1© |
Dble |
Rdbl |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Kamel’s 2© rebid showed the standard minimum handtype with
six hearts and it seems aggressive that Shaker invited game. It
was perhaps a little unfortunate that the club values were not pulling
their weight, but 4© always rated to be a thin contract and so it
proved. Guillermo Mooney led the queen of spades to dummy’s
ace and Kamel playe dtwo more rounds of spades. Back came a club
and he won and cashed the other club winner before ruffing his last
spade with dummy’s ©10. Monsegur over-ruffed and played a
diamond to his partner’s king. With no entry to dummy, there
were two more hearts to lose for down two; -200.
Abdel Samie did not double the opening bid at the other table
and Assumpcao followed an invitational sequence focusing on diamonds.
There were three trump losers plus a heart and a spade; down one
for –100 but 3 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina.
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S
Vul. |
|
ª 9 7
© 7 6 3
¨ A K J 9 4
§ 9 6 4 |
ª 10 8 5
© J 9 5 4
¨ 6 5
§ Q 7 5 2 |
|
ª A K 6 2
© A K 8
¨ Q 8 7
§ J 8 3 |
|
ª Q J 4 3
© Q 10 2
¨ 10 3 2
§ A K 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
|
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1NT |
Dble |
Pass |
2¨ |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
|
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
Samie opened 1NT and was left to play there. After a diamond lead
he managed to find a way to seven tricks for +90.
Mooney had to open 1§ and rebid in no trump and now Shaker doubled
to show an opening hand including some club length. Kamel removed
that to 2¨ and played there on the lead of a top spade. Mooney switched
to a club and kamel won the ace and crossed to a top diamond. It
looks right to play a spade now, thereby preserving a later trump
entry to hand, but Kamel cashed the second diamond first. Had Mooney
gone up with the ªK there would have been eight easy tricks but
he correctly played low and dummy’s queen scored. Kamel ruffed
a spade then played a heart to Mooney’s king. Mooney cashed
the ¨Q and played a club and Kamel ducked to the queen. Monsegur
returned a heart and Kamel had eight tricks for +90 and a flat board.
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W
Vul. |
|
ª 8 5
© K J 9 4 3 2
¨ A 9
§ K Q 8 |
ª 9 6
© Q 7 6 5
¨ K 6 4
§ J 9 5 3 |
|
ª A K J 4 2
© -
¨ Q 8 3 2
§ A 6 4 2 |
|
ª Q 10 7 3
© A 10 8
¨ J 10 7 5
§ 10 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
|
|
1ª |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
|
|
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
2© |
All Pass |
|
Kamel’s double then bid 2© combination looks too much and
it got him too high. Mooney cashed a top spade then switched to
a diamond for the king and ace so there was no danger of a defensive
slip-up. Kamel won the diamond and played a spade up and Mooney
won then cashed his black winners before exiting with a club. When
declarer got the trumps wrong he was down two for –100.
Wattar responded with the West cards and Chagas made a simple
overcall. Two Hearts made exactly on a similar line of play for
+110 and 5 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina.
Board 10. Dealer East. All
Vul. |
|
ª K 7 4
© K 9 7 5 3
¨ Q
§ 8 7 6 4 |
ª A Q
© Q 8 6 4
¨ K 9 3 2
§ K 10 9 |
|
ª J 6 5 3
© A J 2
¨ J 7 6
§ Q J 5 |
|
ª 10 9 8 2
© 10
¨ A 10 8 5 4
§ A 3 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Monsegur showed a weak no trump type and played in 1NT on a low
heart lead, which he ran to his queen. Declarer tried the ªQ from
hand and that was allowed to hold the trick. Next he played a heart
to the jack followed by a club to the king and a second round to
the jack and ace. Back came a spade. Monsegur took his winners then
led to the ¨K for an overtrick; +120.
Wattar stretched his hand and was raised to 3NT via Stayman. Chagas
led a spade to the queen but that gave declarer nothing he could
not do for himself. On this lie of the cards there was no way to
come to nine tricks and the contract actually went two down for
–200 and 8 IMPs to Brazil/Argentina.
Board 12. Dealer West. N/S
Vul. |
|
ª A K J 10
© Q 4 2
¨ Q 9 8 6
§ 8 6 |
ª 9 6 2
© J 10 7
¨ 5
§ J 10 5 4 3 2 |
|
ª Q 8 5 4 3
© 8 6 3
¨ K J 10
§ A K |
|
ª 7
© A K 9 5
¨ A 7 4 3 2
§ Q 9 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Monsegur |
Kamel |
Mooney |
Shaker |
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
Dble |
2ª |
2NT |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wattar |
Chagas |
Samie |
Assumpcao |
Pass |
1¨ |
1ª |
2© |
2ª |
3© |
3ª |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
I am not convinced that Kamel’s 2NT bid shows a mere weak
no trump but the Egyptians managed to get to a making game when
he repeated no trump at his next turn. Shaker thought for some time
before passing but eventually came to the winning decision. Mooney
led a spade to the nine and jack and Kamel led the ¨9 for ten and
ace then a second round to the eight and jack. The fortunate (or
unfortunate according to your perspective) club position left the
defence powerless. When Mooney switched to a heart then played a
second heart on winning the next diamond declarer had ten tricks
for +630.
Assumpcao made the strange decision to bid his four-card heart
suit and it was normal, even looking at that spade holding, for
Chagas to raise the hearts then choose to play 4© rather than 5¨
- not that it mattered once 3NT had been left behind. Four Hearts
went two down for –200 and 13 IMPs to Egypt, a little relief
at the end of a poor set for them.
Brazil/Argentina led by 37-14 at the half and increased their margin
of victory to 65-31, 21-9 VPs at the end of the match.
|