Japan v Australia –
Senior Bowl Round 5
After two days play the Australian Senior team was lying third,
just 2 VPs behind the leaders. Round Five saw them face Japan, also
well in touch in seventh position.
Board 17. Dealer North. None
Vul. |
|
ª 9 8 7 6 3
© J 5
¨ Q
§ K Q 10 9 6 |
ª Q J 2
© Q 7 6
¨ A K 9 7 6 4
§ 4 |
|
ª A K 10
© A 10 4 2
¨ 8
§ A J 7 5 2 |
|
ª 5 4
© K 9 8 3
¨ J 10 5 3 2
§ 8 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Walsh |
Yamada |
Haughie |
Ohno |
|
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Nakatani |
Lester |
Naniwada |
Lorentz |
|
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
|
Masaru Naniwada,
Japan |
|
Both Easts declared 3NT and both received a low diamond lead on
which they played the ace. For Japan, Masaru Naniwada continued
with king then nine of diamonds to the ten. Gabi Lorentz switched
to a spade but Nanwada was in control, being able to establish the
diamonds and get to them when the ©K
was onside; ten tricks for +430.
Bill Haughie preferred to play on hearts when North showed out
on the second diamond and tried leading to the ten at trick two.
Kyoko Ohno took the ©K and returned the nine to dummy’s queen.
Haughie played dummy’s club and Akihiko Yamada split his honours.
Haughie won the §A and cashed the spades then led to the heart ace.
Down to three clubs and a losing heart, he exited with a low club
and Yamada had to win the nine. He could cash a spade but had kept
too many clubs so now had to concede the last trick to declarer’s
jack; nine tricks for +400 but 1 IMP to Japan.
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W
Vul. |
|
ª 8 6 5
© A 10 9 8
¨ A Q 7 4
§ 10 8 |
ª A 7 4 2
© Q 7 5 3
¨ J 9 5
§ 7 4 |
|
ª J 10
© K 4 2
¨ 10 6
§ K J 9 6 3 2 |
|
ª K Q 9 3
© J 6
¨ K 8 3 2
§ A Q 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Walsh |
Yamada |
Haughie |
Ohno |
|
|
|
1¨ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Nakatani |
Lester |
Naniwada |
Lorentz |
|
|
|
1NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Lorentz showed a weak no trump while Yamada’s sequence promised
15-17, making the subsequent decisions automatic. After a heart
lead and spade switch, Lorentz took both heart and club finesses
to come to eleven tricks for +210. Ohno received a spade lead to
the ten and king. She ran the jack of hearts to the king and back
came the ªJ for queen, ducked. A heart to the nine won and now Ohno
gave up a spade. She did not take the club finesse so held herself
to ten tricks for +430 and 6 IMPs to Japan.
Board 21. Dealer North. N/S
Vul. |
|
ª 6 5
© Q 7 6 3
¨ K 10 6 5 4
§ 6 5 |
ª 10 8 7 3 2
© J
¨ 9
§ J 9 7 4 3 2 |
|
ª K Q 9 4
© 9 8 4 2
¨ 7
§ A K Q 8 |
|
ª A J
© A K 10 5
¨ A Q J 8 3 2
§ 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Walsh |
Yamada |
Haughie |
Ohno |
|
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
4§ |
Pass |
5§ |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Nakatani |
Lester |
Naniwada |
Lorentz |
|
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
3§ |
Pass |
Pass |
3¨ |
3ª |
5¨ |
5ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
How should you handle the West cards after South’s take-out
double? The two Wests were actually in quite different situations
because Haughie had virtually guaranteed four clubs while Naniwada
might have had only two.
Alan Walsh jumped to 4§ and Haughie raised himself to game, leaving
Ohno with no option but to bid 5¨. With his right-hand-opponent
having been forced to bid under pressure, Walsh could not justify
bidding again, despite his extra distribution. He led the jack of
hearts but there was nothing to the hand; +600.
Tadayoshi Nakatani could not afford to jump quite so aggressively
at his first turn and contented himself with a raise to 3§, however,
that worked very well a sit allowed him to show the spades at his
next turn and now it was an easy matter for Naniwada to go on to
5ª over 5¨. Five Spades doubled was down only one for –100
but 11 IMPs to Japan.
My own preference, for what it is worth, would be to bid 4§ facing
a four-card club opener but with the intention of then bidding 4ª
over four of a red suit. Nakatani’s sequence looks just fine
opposite potentially short clubs.
Board 22. Dealer East. E/W
Vul. |
|
ª 10 9 8 4 3
© 9 4
¨ 7 2
§ K Q J 8 |
ª K
© A Q J 8
¨ Q 10 4 3
§ 10 9 6 4 |
|
ª A 7 6
© 7 6
¨ K J 9 8 6 5
§ 5 3 |
|
ª Q J 5 2
© K 10 5 3 2
¨ A
§ A 7 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Walsh |
Yamada |
Haughie |
Ohno |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Nakatani |
Lester |
Naniwada |
Lorentz |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
Ohno contented herself with a simple raise of the 1ª response,
downgrading the singleton ace slightly. East/West do very well in
a diamond contract, but the vulnerability dissuaded Haughie from
protecting. He passed out 2ª and led a club. Yamada won dummy’s
ace and played the ªQ to the bare king and back came a second club.
Yamada won and played another spade. Haughie won the ace and switched
to a heart so the defence got its heart tricks and a club ruff;
just made for +110.
Lorentz could show an invitational spade raise with a singleton
diamond so did so – a slight stretch, perhaps, but the ability
to describe the distribution perhaps justifies that. John Lester
went on to game and this time the lead was a low trump followed
by a club switch. The defence was a tempo behind now so the club
ruff was lost, but there were still four major-suit losers; down
one for –50 and 4 IMPs to Japan.
Board 25. Dealer North. E/W
Vul. |
|
ª J 7
© Q 7 6
¨ K 8 5
§ A Q J 9 2 |
ª A 10 3
© A J 10
¨ 10 7
§ K 10 6 5 3 |
|
ª K Q 8 6 4 2
© K
¨ A Q J 4 3
§ 7 |
|
ª 9 5
© 9 8 5 4 3 2
¨ 9 6 2
§ 8 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Walsh |
Yamada |
Haughie |
Ohno |
|
1NT |
2NT |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Nakatani |
Lester |
Naniwada |
Lorentz |
|
1NT |
2ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Both Norths opened with a weak no trump but the respective Easts
chose very different approaches to showing their potentially very
powerful hand. Naniwada made a simple overcall in spades while Haughie
preferred to show any strong two-suite. The first approach found
an easy raise to game from Nakatani while Walsh had to find a sensible
response in an undiscussed sequence. His 4© bid was intended and
taken as pass or correct so 4ª was again the final contract.
Ohno led a spade while Lorentz chose a club, so +710 for Haughie
and +680 for Naniwada; 1 IMP to Australia.
Board 26. Dealer East. All
Vul. |
|
ª Q 4
© K Q 10 7 6
¨ Q 7 5
§ A Q 3 |
ª 8 7 3
© A
¨ 9 6 4 2
§ K J 10 7 2 |
|
ª A K J 9 6 5 2
© 4 2
¨ J 10
§ 6 4 |
|
ª 10
© J 9 8 5 3
¨ A K 8 3
§ 9 8 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Walsh |
Yamada |
Haughie |
Ohno |
Nakatani |
Lester |
Naniwada |
Lorentz |
|
|
3ª |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
There is one slim chance for declarer in 4ª, given that the clubs
are both offside, namely that the ¨9 will become established for
a club discard. Both Souths led the ace and king of diamonds then
switched to the five of clubs for the jack and queen. Lester duly
cashed the ace of clubs now for down one; -100. Yamada tried to
cash the ¨Q instead and that was ten tricks for +620 and 12 IMPs
to Australia. Haughie followed with the §4, so with Ohno’s
switch being systemically third or fifth, there should have been
no possibility of confusion, unless I misread the Japanese convention
card.
Despite this mishap, Japan led 25-18 at half-time. The second
half saw Australia come through to win by 48-33IMPs, 18-12VPs.
|