Round
8: USA v Sweden – Seniors
After seven rounds of the Seniors competition, Sweden headed the
table while USA were close behind near the front of the chasing
pack. The match began quietly with two flat boards but then exploded
into life with two big swings.
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 7
© A K 9 2
¨ A J
§ A 9 7 5 4 3 |
ª 6 5 3
© J 7 3
¨ Q 10 5 4 2
§ K 2 |
|
ª 10 9
© Q 8 6 5 4
¨ K 9 7 6 3
§ 10 |
|
ª A K Q J 8 4 2
© 10
¨ 8
§ Q J 8 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Bell |
Hallen |
Miles |
Backstrom |
|
|
|
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5ª |
Pass |
5NT |
Pass |
7ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ekberg |
Robison |
Alfredsson |
Onstott |
|
|
|
4ª |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
|
For USA, John Onstott opened 4ª and Jim Robison simply punted the
small slam, trusting the trump suit to be decent at this vulnerability.
After a diamond lead, Onstott drew trumps and took the club finesse
for his overtrick; a painless +1460.
For Sweden, Lars Backstrom opened 1ª. According to his partner’s
explanation, the 4ª rebid showed good spades but no club fit. Anyway,
whatever the subtleties of that call, Hans-Olof Hallen checked on
key cards then invited seven, and Backstrom was sufficiently impressed
with his black-suit holdings to accept the invitation. Leo Bell
led a trump and Backstrom won, drew a few more rounds, pitching
clubs from the dummy, then led the queen of clubs. When Bell played
low without a flicker, Backstrom went up with the ace and was one
down in his ‘laydown’ grand slam; -100 and 17 IMPs to
USA.
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª K 6 5
© A K J 9 8 6 4
¨ 6
§ 6 4 |
ª 4 2
© -
¨ K J 5 2
§ A Q 10 9 7 5 2 |
|
ª A Q 9 7
© Q 10 2
¨ A Q 10 7 4
§ 8 |
|
ª J 10 8 3
© 7 5 3
¨ 9 8 3
§ K J 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Bell |
Hallen |
Miles |
Backstrom |
Pass |
4§ |
Dble |
4© |
6§ |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ekberg |
Robison |
Alfredsson |
Onstott |
1§ |
1© |
Dble |
2© |
3§ |
4© |
Dble |
All Pass |
Bell saw no sensible opening bid on the West cards so passed to
await developments. Those developments proved to be a 4§ opening
on his left, showing a heart suit with one hole in it, and a double
from partner, Marshall Miles. What the American agreement for this
double was, I am not sure, but I would have thought it was normal
for it to be take-out of hearts. If so, Miles must have felt rather
uncomfortable when his partner leapt to 6§ over Backstrom’s
conversion to 4©, but what could he do about it?
The club slam proved to be no problem for Bell. He ruffed the heart
lead, crossed to a top diamond and took the finesse of the queen
of clubs. When the clubs proved to be three-two with the king onside,
there was just a club to be conceded, the second spade going on
the long diamond; +1370.
Ekberg opened a quiet 1§ as West and Jim Robison overcalled 1©.
Lars Alfredsson made a negative double and Onstott raised hearts.
Now Ekberg made a slightly cautious 3§ rebid and Robison jumped
to 4©. A penalty double from Alfredsson concluded proceedings. Perfect
defence nets six tricks for down three, but that is difficult to
achieve on this deal and the contract was actually two down for
–300 but 14 IMPs to USA, who had taken a grip on the match
with 31 IMPs in two deals.
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª A K Q 9 8 3
© -
¨ 9 3 2
§ J 8 5 2 |
ª J 7
© A 10 8 7 6 3
¨ 6
§ A 10 9 6 |
|
ª 5
© K J 9 5 4
¨ K Q 10 8 4
§ K 3 |
|
ª 10 6 4 2
© Q 2
¨ A J 7 5
§ Q 7 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Bell |
Hallen |
Miles |
Backstrom |
1© |
1ª |
3ª |
4ª |
5§ |
Pass |
5¨ |
Dble |
5© |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ekberg |
Robison |
Alfredsson |
Onstott |
Pass |
1ª |
Dble |
2NT |
4© |
4ª |
5© |
Pass |
Pass |
5ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
Bell opened the West hand with 1© and Miles made a splinter raise
over the 1ª overcall. When Backstrom competed with 4ª, Bell was
willing to show his club control and East/West did well from here
to settle for 5©, making exactly for +650.
Ekberg was not willing to open at the one level with 9 HCP, nor
at the two level when holding a poor main suit and two aces. At
his table it was North, Robison, who opened the bidding with 1ª
and Alfredsson doubled. Onstott showed a constructive spade raise
and Ekberg had an easy 4© bid. When Robison went on to 4ª, Alfredsson
in turn went on to 5© but then doubled when Robison bid his spades
one more time. With eleven tricks the linmit in a heart contract,
taking 500 out of 5ª was the best that east/West could do, though
it cost them 4 IMPs.
Board 23. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª A 7 5
© Q J 9 6 3
¨ 5
§ 10 4 3 2 |
ª K J 4 3 2
© A 8 4
¨ A K J 7 3
§ - |
|
ª Q 8 6
© 10 7 5
¨ Q 10 9 8 6 4
§ A |
|
ª 10 9
© K 2
¨ 2
§ K Q J 9 8 7 6 5 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Bell |
Hallen |
Miles |
Backstrom |
|
|
|
1§ |
1ª |
2© |
2ª |
3§ |
4ª |
5§ |
Dble |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Ekberg |
Robison |
Alfredsson |
Onstott |
|
|
|
4§ |
Dble |
5§ |
5¨ |
All Pass |
Backstrom opened the South hand with 1§ and a fierce competitive
auction developed, ending in 5§ doubled. It appears that there should
be a loser in each suit in this contract but, after cashing a top
diamond, Bell played a second round rather than switch to a spade.
He had seen his partner encourage diamonds, rather than make a suit
preference signal for spades, but I am still unconvinced that a
spade switch was not correct – maybe partner had not signalled
spades, but he had equally not signalled hearts, and a spade switch
would never cost unless East held the ©K, irrespective of the position
of the ªQ.
Anyway, whatever the rights or wrongs of the defence, the contract
escaped for down one; -200.
Onstott opened 4§ and Robison raised to 5§ over the take-out double.
Alfredsson tried 5¨ and was left to play there. That made in some
comfort after a club lead and Sweden had 9 IMPs, their only significant
gain of the set. USA won the match by 42-10 IMPs, 23-7 VPs, and
moved to joint top of the standings, while Sweden slipped to fifth.
That may be the end of this match, but it is by no means the end
of the story of Board 23. We will read elsewhere about the Canadian
Seniors’ exploits on the deal in question, but here let’s
take a look at what happened when Israel met Denmark, also in the
Seniors.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Levit |
Lund |
Kaminski |
Moller |
|
|
|
4§ |
Dble |
5§ |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Norris |
Schwartz |
Dahl |
Romik |
|
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
4§ |
5§ |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
6§ |
Pass |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
Steen Moller opened with a club pre-empt and Yeshayahu Levit doubled
for take-out. When Peter Lund raised to 5§, Amos Kaminski tried
5¨ and Levit raised to slam. After a club lead, Kaminski could win,
draw trumps and knock out the ace of spades to come to an easy twelve
tricks; +1370.
There are a couple of books about entitled ‘25 Conventions
You Should Know’ and ‘25 More Conventions You Should
Know’, both published by the excellent MasterPoint Press of
Canada. I would like to write ’25 Conventions You Would Be
Better Off Never Having Heard Of’. My 25 would include Namyats.
Here, Pinhas Romik could not open 4§ because that would have shown
a good 4© bid and, as he did not deem 1§ to be appropriate, passed
as dealer. At his next turn he made a pre-emptive overcall of 4§
and his opponents bid to 5¨, where they were about to play until
Adrian Schwartz saved in 6§. Now Georg Norris went on to the diamond
slam.
Romik had to find a lead. His partner had not doubled West’s
5§ cuebid, suggesting that he did not have the ace of clubs, yet
had been willing to save in 6§, risking that his opponents might
go on to 6¨. He should, therefore, have some defence somewhere.
Romik decided that a club lead would achieve nothing and that he
should attack, leading from strength. His logic led him to put the
king of hearts on the table and the slam was defeated when it would
have made on any non-heart lead! Very nicely done and 16 IMPs to
Israel, helping them to an 18-12 VP win in an important match in
this championship.
|