Rivalry
heats up
When Italy and the USA last met before Istanbul, it was one of
the most memorable matches in world championship history, the Americans
coming away with a 1-IMP victory secured on the final deal of the
Bermuda Bowl in Monte Carlo.
It was a different American team in Monte Carlo, but the rivalry
seemed just as intense as the two squads were matched in the round
of 16 at the World Bridge Olympiad.
Spectators were treated to a seesaw battle as the Italians won
the first and third sets, the Americans the second and fourth. Entering
the fifth and final set of the match, USA had a lead of 129-104.
On the first board of the set, they increased the lead to 30 IMPs.
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª -
© K 7 6
¨ K Q 2
§ K J 9 6 5 3 2 |
ª Q 10 8 6 2
© Q J 10 5 2
¨ -
§ A 10 8 |
|
ª A J
© 9 8
¨ 10 9 8 7 6 4 3
§ Q 7 |
|
ª K 9 7 5 4 3
© A 4 3
¨ A J 5
§ 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weinstein |
Fantoni |
Levin |
Nunes |
|
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
3§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
All Pass |
|
|
After Fulvio Fantoni’s natural 2§ opener, Steve Weinstein’s
3§ over the 2¨ inquiry indicated both majors. Bobby Levin preferred
diamonds if Weinstein had any of them at all, but Weinstein did
not want to put down a dummy void in trumps. Weinstein was limited
to seven tricks in his heart contract, but the phrase no double,
no trouble was applicable. There was trouble in the open room.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Rosenberg |
Bocchi |
Zia |
|
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
2© |
3§ |
3¨ |
Dble |
3© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Michael Rosenberg started with a low diamond, and Giorgio Duboin
ruffed when Zia played the ace. Rosenberg discarded a club at trick
two when Duboin played a spade toward dummy. Declarer went up with
the ace and played a second spade, taken by Zia with the king. Zia
got out with his singleton club, ducked by declarer to Rosenberg’s
king. Zia ruffed the club return, then played the ©A and another
heart, leaving declarer with a further spade loser for two down
and plus 300 to USA, now up by 30 IMPs. They didn’t score
again for eight deals.
Italy struck for 11 IMPs on the next deal.
Board 18. Dealer East. N/S Vul.
|
|
ª 6 3 2
© Q 8 6 5
¨ Q 7
§ J 9 6 4 |
ª Q 10 9 5
© 9 7 4
¨ J
§ A Q 10 5 2 |
|
ª A J 7
© 10 2
¨ A 9 8 5 4 3
§ K 8 |
|
ª K 8 4
© A K J 3
¨ K 10 6 2
§ 7 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Rosenberg |
Bocchi |
Zia |
|
|
1NT |
Dble |
Redbl |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
All Pass |
|
Norberto Bocchi started with the §K and switched to the ª7 at trick
two. Rosenberg went up with dummy’s king, pulled trumps, ending
in hand, and played the ¨Q. The defenders took two spades and a
club from there – plus 110 to USA.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weinstein |
Fantoni |
Levin |
Nunes |
|
|
1¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
Pass |
2© |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
This was not a success for USA. Levin started with the §K, overtaken
by Weinstein with the ace to play his singleton diamond. Levin won
the ace and gave Weinstein a ruff. A spade went to the ace, and
Weinstein ruffed another diamond, overruffed by declarer. The defenders
could collect only a club from that point and Italy had plus 670.
Was there confusion between Weinstein and Levin as to the nature
of Weinstein’s double? If not, it seems a big position for
Levin to sit for the double of 2©.
Italy earned a game swing on the next deal for another 7-IMP pickup
to close to within 12 IMPs.
More IMPs came Italy’s way when Bocchi and Duboin took the
right view in a competitive auction.
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª A K 10 3
© 9 8
¨ 7 2
§ A Q 7 3 2 |
ª 4 2
© Q J 7
¨ Q 9 6 3
§ J 10 6 4 |
|
ª 7 6 5
© A K 10 6 4 3 2
¨ K 4
§ 8 |
|
ª Q J 9 8
© 5
¨ A J 10 8 5
§ K 9 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Rosenberg |
Bocchi |
Zia |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
Dble |
2© |
2ª |
4§ |
4ª |
5© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Bocchi’s 4§ bid helped Duboin with his decision to take the
save over 4ª, and Zia did well to double rather than bidding 5ª,
which has no play. Still it was a 4-IMP loss because Fantoni and
Nunes were allowed to play in 4ª, making, in the closed room.
Italy took the lead for good on the following board, which should
have been a swing to USA.
Board 23. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª A 7 5 4
© A Q 8 4 3
¨ K 2
§ 6 4 |
ª 10
© 10 9
¨ A 10 7 5
§ K Q J 9 5 3 |
|
ª K J 8 6 2
© 5 2
¨ J 9
§ A 8 7 2 |
|
ª Q 9 3
© K J 7 6
¨ Q 8 6 4 3
§ 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weinstein |
Fantoni |
Levin |
Nunes |
|
|
|
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
1ª |
2NT |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
Levin started with the ª2, which went to the 10 and ace. The play
was not challenging with trumps 2-2, so Fantoni duly chalked up
plus 620.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Rosenberg |
Bocchi |
Zia |
|
|
|
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
Dble |
4© |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
The Italian methods required Bocchi to double after the 1© overcall
– a bid of 1ª would have indicated no four-card majors, while
a transfer bid of 2© would have indicated game-forcing values or
at least six spades. Double indicated four or more spades.
Bocchi’s double of 4© was obviously based on Duboin’s
opening bid, but that may not have been completely clear to Rosenberg
indicated by the way he played the doubled contract.
Bocchi started with the §A and continued with a club, ruffed in
dummy. Rosenberg played a diamond to the king, followed by another
diamond. Rosenberg ducked when East played the ¨J. Bocchi switched
to a low heart, which went to the 7, 9 and ace. Once the possibility
of a 4-0 trump split had been eliminated, it seems safe enough to
enter dummy with a trump, planning on ruffing another diamond. If
trumps are 2-2, the contract is a virtual lock, and if they are
3-1, there would still be chances depending on who had the remaining
trump.
Rosenberg, however, played a low spade from hand after winning
the trump switch, and that was the end of the contract. Bocchi won
the ªK and gave his partner a ruff for down one and a 13-IMP swing
to Italy, now ahead by 6 IMPs.
Another 10 IMPs went to Italy when Duboin made a state-of-the-match
decision in the play that was huge success.
Board 24. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª Q 4 3
© A 9 8 5
¨ Q 6
§ 10 6 5 2 |
ª A J 8
© 6 3
¨ A K 5 3 2
§ Q 8 3 |
|
ª K 10 6
© Q 10 7
¨ 9 8 4
§ A K J 4 |
|
ª 9 7 5 2
© K J 4 2
¨ J 10 7
§ 9 7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Rosenberg |
Bocchi |
Zia |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Rosenberg started with a low heart and the defenders quickly cashed
four tricks in that suti, Rosenberg exiting with a club at the end.
Duboin embarked on a scheme to try to get a count on the opposing
hands. He won the §Q in hand at trick five, cashed the top two diamonds,
then played off dummy’s three clubs, pitching his last diamond.
Zia, meanwhile, had followed to two clubs and discarded two spades.
It looked as though Zia started with four spades, making it more
likely that he held the ªQ, the card declarer needed to locate to
make the contract.
On Vugraph, Duboin made a point of picking up his scorecard for
a look as a prelude to finessing North rather than South for the
ªQ. Estimating that his team was still trailing and believing a
swing was need, Duboin made an anti-percentage play to try to turns
things around.
As you can see, Duboin was right. In the closed room, the defense
went exactly the same, and Weinstein played the same way to get
the same information. After giving the matter due thought, Weinstein
played the ªK and was down one.
The Americans earned a slam swing on board 30 to pull to within
11 IMPs with two boards to go, but the next-to-last deal was a routine
part score – 2© bid and made at both tables for a push.
American partisans had some hope as the final deal unfolded.
Board 32. Dealer West. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª Q 10 5
© Q J 9 6
¨ 8 7 6 4
§ 7 4 |
ª A 3
© A 4
¨ A K 10 2
§ A 6 5 3 2 |
|
ª K 7 2
© K 8 5 3
¨ Q
§ K Q J 10 8 |
|
ª J 9 8 6 4
© 10 7 2
¨ J 9 5 3
§ 9 |
Levin and Weinstein got their auction out of the way first.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weinstein |
Fantoni |
Levin |
Nunes |
1§ |
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
7§ |
All Pass |
It was a good auction to the perfect contract . If the Italians
failed to bid the grand slam, USA would again edge them out on the
final board. Not many would bet against the Italians on this deal,
however, and indeed they had no trouble with the bidding.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Duboin |
Rosenberg |
Bocchi |
Zia |
1§ |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
7§ |
All Pass |
It was a flat board and a 157-146 victory for Italy.
|